2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2013-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a cyclic uniaxial strain on urinary bladder cells

Abstract: PurposePre-conditioning of a cell seeded construct may improve the functional outcome of a tissue engineered construct for augmentation cystoplasty. The precise effects of mechanical stimulation on urinary bladder cells in vitro are not clear. In this study we investigate the effect of a cyclic uniaxial strain culture on urinary bladder cells which were seeded on a type I collagen scaffold.MethodsIsolated porcine smooth muscle cells or urothelial cells were seeded on a type I collagen scaffolds and cultured un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural porous polymer scaffolds can be produced nowadays by many different methods, such as solvent casting, phase separation, gas-foaming techniques, electrospinning, freeze extraction, lyophilization, 3D printing, etc., to produce porous urinary bladder scaffolds with very different degrees of interconnected porosity and with a wide range of pore morphologies [ 34 ]. Thus, an interconnected porous natural type I collagen scaffold with pores ranging from 50 to 100 µm has been recently prepared by lyophilization and utilized as a strip clamped in a Bose Electroforce Bio-Dynamic bioreactor to study the effect of a cyclic uniaxial strain on urinary bladder cells [ 48 ].…”
Section: Tissue Engineering For Urinary Bladder Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Natural porous polymer scaffolds can be produced nowadays by many different methods, such as solvent casting, phase separation, gas-foaming techniques, electrospinning, freeze extraction, lyophilization, 3D printing, etc., to produce porous urinary bladder scaffolds with very different degrees of interconnected porosity and with a wide range of pore morphologies [ 34 ]. Thus, an interconnected porous natural type I collagen scaffold with pores ranging from 50 to 100 µm has been recently prepared by lyophilization and utilized as a strip clamped in a Bose Electroforce Bio-Dynamic bioreactor to study the effect of a cyclic uniaxial strain on urinary bladder cells [ 48 ].…”
Section: Tissue Engineering For Urinary Bladder Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vascularization of bioengineered organs can be achieved by ex vivo approaches, such as cell sheet engineering, spheroid coculture, scaffold functionalization, modular assembly, and bioprinting or addressed in vivo by arteriovenous loops, polysurgery, and genetic manipulations [ 130 ]. Scaffold survival is profoundly dependent on the formation of a new vascular bed, and this process becomes more difficult with the increase of the construct size [ 48 ]. We believe that the lack of functionality of the engineered bladder tissue is a good reason to discourage researchers and explains somehow the low high-impact scientific production in this scientific area during the last decade (see Table 4 ).…”
Section: Tissue Engineering For Urinary Bladder Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strips were initially seeded statically with SMC or UC and then dynamically in the bioreactor, while control scaffolds were cultured under static conditions. The results demonstrated that conditioning of collagen-based scaffolds by mechanical stimulation leads to more SMC, probably bypassing difficulties related to poor SMC in-growth and muscle development in tissue engineered bladders [67].…”
Section: Mechanical Stimulation Of Scaffold Using a Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Collagen matrices (type I collagen) were prepared from bovine achilleas tendon (Southern Lights Biomaterials) as previously described. 27 , 28 In brief, a 0,5% (w/v) collagen suspension was made by swelling and subsequently homogenization in 0.25 M acetic acid at 4°C. The suspension was deaerated by centrifugation (at 120 g for 30 min), casted in 6‐well plates and frozen at −20°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%