2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290501.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio‐Oss® with bone tissue

Abstract: The adjunct of Tisseel may jeopardize the integration of Bio-Oss particles with bone tissue.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
78
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
10
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bio-Oss has been proposed as a biocompatible graft material for bony defects for it has shown osteoconductive properties -that is, it was replaced with newly formed bone after grafting [18][19][20] . However, regarding the resorption of Bio-Oss, contradicting reports have emerged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bio-Oss has been proposed as a biocompatible graft material for bony defects for it has shown osteoconductive properties -that is, it was replaced with newly formed bone after grafting [18][19][20] . However, regarding the resorption of Bio-Oss, contradicting reports have emerged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, in contrast to Bio-Oss alone group, no soft connective tissue replacement with newly formed bone was observed in Bio-Oss/fibrin treated defects. 142 A fibrin sealant was also reported to inhibit bone induction in the abdominal muscles of rats when used in combination with demineralized bone particles. The inhibited bone formation was perhaps due to the immunological response to xenogeneic proteins (fibrinogen and thrombin were from humans and aprotinin was of bovine origin).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…141 As mentioned earlier, some researchers noted a negative impact of fibrin on bone repair. For example, Carmagnola et al 142 noted that adding fibrin to Bio-Oss particles resulted in 4 times less tissue contact between bone and biomaterials in mandibular defects of dogs. Besides, in contrast to Bio-Oss alone group, no soft connective tissue replacement with newly formed bone was observed in Bio-Oss/fibrin treated defects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another xenogeneic, bone-derived implant material is Bio-Oss, which is similar to the xenograft investigated in our studies (Develioglu et al2009(Develioglu et al , 2010. Bio-Oss has been proposed as a biocompatible graft material for bony defects for it has shown osteoconductive properties -that is, it was replaced with newly formed bone after grafting (Yıldırım et al, 2001, Sculean et al, 2002, Carmagnola et al, 2002. However, regarding the resorption of Bio-Oss, contradicting reports have emerged.…”
Section: Bioactive Ceramic Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 76%