2019
DOI: 10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of a Holistic School Improvement Model in Enhancing School Effectiveness in Oman

Abstract: Purpose - This study examined the impact of a holistic school improvement model on overall school effectiveness, More specifically, it attempted to answer two questions: 1) Are there any significant differences in school performance between the control group and the experimental group before and after the experiment? 2) Is there any significant improvement in the experimental group school effectiveness before and after the experiment? Methodology - As a part of a four-year longitudinal research project, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rank order of the factors (the ISW driving forces) was based on Al Farra's ( 2009) rating scale in terms of their degree of importance and contribution to sustainable school improvement as shown in Table 2. Overall, the conclusions drawn from this study appear to be in congruence with previous research on school effectiveness (Al Mekhlafi & Osman, 2019;Brunings, 2014;Creemers & Kyriakides, 2012;Cowell, N. 2013;Osman, M. & Abdo Al Mekhlafi, 2018), indicating that context-specific systemic approaches to educational reform have the potential to instigate favorable alterations in school operational procedures and result in substantial enhancements in school efficiency. Efficient leadership, which considers teacher involvement and active participation, has been identified as pivotal in improving the school atmosphere and, as a result, elevating student academic performance (Amin, Shah, & Tatlah, 2013;Jeyasushma Veeriah, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The rank order of the factors (the ISW driving forces) was based on Al Farra's ( 2009) rating scale in terms of their degree of importance and contribution to sustainable school improvement as shown in Table 2. Overall, the conclusions drawn from this study appear to be in congruence with previous research on school effectiveness (Al Mekhlafi & Osman, 2019;Brunings, 2014;Creemers & Kyriakides, 2012;Cowell, N. 2013;Osman, M. & Abdo Al Mekhlafi, 2018), indicating that context-specific systemic approaches to educational reform have the potential to instigate favorable alterations in school operational procedures and result in substantial enhancements in school efficiency. Efficient leadership, which considers teacher involvement and active participation, has been identified as pivotal in improving the school atmosphere and, as a result, elevating student academic performance (Amin, Shah, & Tatlah, 2013;Jeyasushma Veeriah, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the context of an institution, self-evaluation is an evaluation conducted by the institution to collect the data, data analysis, and interpretation of results used for planning, development, improvement, and improvement of the institution's performance (Nuchron et al, 2013). At this point, the institution's improvement relates to the theories and research regarding the strategies for the positive changes in the educational system to achieve the goals (Mekhlafi & Osman, 2019). Self-evaluation is used to explore, understand, and be well aware of the institution's profile, including quality and current institutional conditions to be used as a basis for the institution to determine the target or desired future conditions (Nuchron et al, 2013).…”
Section: Self Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors agree that strong instructional, school, academic, collaborative and collegial leadership has a significant influence on the effectiveness of schools [32][33][34]36,39,[41][42][43][44]48,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Strong Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%