1974
DOI: 10.1080/01944367408977479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of a Large Urban Park on Real Estate Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A suitable test of the distance-decay effect may be achieved using a regression model. Several researchers have explored the potential of this model, for example, in estimating the decline with distance of the property-value effect of a large urban park (Coughlin & Kawashima, 1973;Hammer, 1971). The initial equations were estimated using the following five variables:…”
Section: Distance-decay Effect In Property-value Impact (Proposition 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suitable test of the distance-decay effect may be achieved using a regression model. Several researchers have explored the potential of this model, for example, in estimating the decline with distance of the property-value effect of a large urban park (Coughlin & Kawashima, 1973;Hammer, 1971). The initial equations were estimated using the following five variables:…”
Section: Distance-decay Effect In Property-value Impact (Proposition 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several hedonic pricing studies demonstrate empirically that proximity to a park -especially the quiet part of a park -raises residential property values. For example, Hammer, Coughlin and Horn (1974) find that proximity to a large regional park in Philadelphia adds to residential property values; Correll, Lillydahl and Singell (1978) produce similar results for homes located close to "greenbelts" in Boulder; and Weicher and Zerbst (1973) show that proximity to the quiet part of neighborhood parks in Columbus, Ohio increases the selling price of a home. For politicians, such a localized positive externality from a public service like a park makes parks especially desireable when they are located next to the homes of one's constituents.…”
Section: Data and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The price premium for homes near parks averaged 20% (Crompton 2005) and the premium declined with increasing distance. However, location rent for vacant land near the 1,294-acre Pennypack Park in Philadelphia accrued 33 % premium at 40 feet from the park (Hammer et al 1974). This premium decayed with increasing distance --to 9% at 1,000 feet, and to 4.2 % at 2,500 feet from the Park.…”
Section: Proximity To Discrete Amenitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%