2018
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a multidisciplinary regional educational programme on the quality of colon cancer resection

Abstract: A multidisciplinary regional educational programme in optimal mesocolic surgery improved the oncological quality of colon cancer specimens as assessed by mesocolic planes; however, there was no significant effect on the amount of tissue resected centrally. Surgeons who attempt central vascular ligation continue to produce more radical specimens suggesting that such educational programmes alone are not sufficient to increase the amount of tissue resected around the tumour.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low reliability of both the German and the mesocolic dissection plane classifications and the lack of evidence supporting morphometry make none of these systems applicable in clinical practice or research. They might be useful for educational purposes guiding surgeons during their learning phase [24]. We suggest that intra‐operative photographs or video recordings are used in future trials to document the completeness of the resections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low reliability of both the German and the mesocolic dissection plane classifications and the lack of evidence supporting morphometry make none of these systems applicable in clinical practice or research. They might be useful for educational purposes guiding surgeons during their learning phase [24]. We suggest that intra‐operative photographs or video recordings are used in future trials to document the completeness of the resections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] Morphometric studies comparing specimens of CME and conventional colon cancer surgery show a significant difference in the area of the mesentery (ie, the mesocolic resection margin toward the retroperitoneum). 8,21 The risk of detecting nonmicroradicality in the mesocolic resection margin increases as potential mesocolic lymph node metastases or other TDs in the central parts of the tumorbearing mesocolon are included in CME specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area of the mesentery is larger in CME specimens than in specimens after conventional resections. 8 Thus, the risk of nonmicroradicality at the mesocolic resection margin might potentially be higher than after conventional resections because some potential lymph node metastases and other TDs in the central part of the mesocolon might be located 1 mm from the mesocolic resection margin. In conventional colon surgery, these are left behind in the patient.…”
Section: Conclusionesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the individual variation of vascular anatomy and the site of the sigmoid tumour, parts of the descending mesocolon and the mesorectum were included in the assessment (Figure 1). The pathologists had in 2008–2009 joined a regional training programme headed by Dr Nick West and Professor Philip Quirke [20]. Before 2013, the histopathological assessments were performed at NOH and afterwards at Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev as the departments merged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%