2022
DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s364480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of a Telehealth Intervention on Mother–Child’s Feeding Interactions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: Purpose This study evaluated the outcomes of a telehealth intervention aimed at enhancing exchanges in mother–child dyads who showed an impoverishment of the quality of their feeding interactions and a worsening of their psychopathological symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods N=334 mothers and their three-year-old children were recruited to assess their feeding interactions through an observational tool administered via a web platform, and maternal and offspri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Practitioners felt families that might not have enrolled in the intervention were able to participate through telehealth, but insight as to why has yet to be fully explored in the literature. Prior telehealth research focuses on feasibility, effectiveness, satisfaction of interventions for autistic children and their families (Cimino & Cerniglia, 2022; Fleet et al, 2022) and has often missed the opportunity to explore how virtual delivery may address systemic barriers to accessing services. In a systematic review, Harkey and colleagues (2020) found support for patient satisfaction for the use of telehealth rehabilitation services, including OT, in rural populations, highlighting a trend toward acceptance of using virtual sessions as part of practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Practitioners felt families that might not have enrolled in the intervention were able to participate through telehealth, but insight as to why has yet to be fully explored in the literature. Prior telehealth research focuses on feasibility, effectiveness, satisfaction of interventions for autistic children and their families (Cimino & Cerniglia, 2022; Fleet et al, 2022) and has often missed the opportunity to explore how virtual delivery may address systemic barriers to accessing services. In a systematic review, Harkey and colleagues (2020) found support for patient satisfaction for the use of telehealth rehabilitation services, including OT, in rural populations, highlighting a trend toward acceptance of using virtual sessions as part of practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study suggests that a telehealth caregiver-mediated intervention can increase caregiver engagement in implementation. Limited research has explored the effectiveness of caregiver-mediated interventions through telehealth for caregivers of autistic children (Srinivasan et al, 2021), even less in the area of eating and mealtime (Cimino & Cerniglia, 2022; Fleet et al, 2022). In our interviews, OTPs described how during EEP-Telehealth sessions the caregivers took on an active role, out of necessity, by being physically with the child while the OTP facilitated through the screen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it began to be administered online, through the use of digital tools, and the results were positive overall. In the study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 51 ], the authors describe that parents and children experienced remote administration of SVIA and the rate of family participation was high. The longitudinal study shows that allowing the family to have direct (albeit remote) contact with clinicians improved the quality of dyadic interactions during feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies use observation scales of remote feeding interactions, with a video recording of the observation made by digital platforms or digital tools. The few available pieces of evidence present overall positive results [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%