1995
DOI: 10.1177/095632029500600601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Absolute Configuration on the Anti-HIV and Anti-HBV Activity of Nucleoside Analogues

Abstract: SummaryThis review concerns the effect of stereoisomerism on the selective activity of anti-HIV and anti-HBV nucleoside analogues.The synthesis of a number of nucleoside analogues with anti-HIV and anti-HBV actiVity yields mixtures of 1-~-D and 1-~-L stereoisomers. Anti-HIV and anti-HBV activity is associated primarily with one of the two enantiomers and the more potent actiVity does not always reside with the 1-~-D configuration characteristic of natural nucleosides. In the case of HIV, the origin of this ste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emtricitabine is consistently (4-10 times) more patent than lamivudine (3TC) in vitro against laboratory strains and primary clinical isolates of HIV (Schinazi et al, 1992;Schinazi et al, 1993;Tisdale et al, 1993). As a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), emtricitabine is readily anabolized by cellular enzymes in a step wise fashion to form its mono phosphate, diphosphate, and finally 5΄-triphosphate (TP) form, the active intracellular moiety that inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and HBV DNA polymerase (Wilson et al, 1993;Furman et al, 1995;Davis et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emtricitabine is consistently (4-10 times) more patent than lamivudine (3TC) in vitro against laboratory strains and primary clinical isolates of HIV (Schinazi et al, 1992;Schinazi et al, 1993;Tisdale et al, 1993). As a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), emtricitabine is readily anabolized by cellular enzymes in a step wise fashion to form its mono phosphate, diphosphate, and finally 5΄-triphosphate (TP) form, the active intracellular moiety that inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and HBV DNA polymerase (Wilson et al, 1993;Furman et al, 1995;Davis et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent demonstration of the stereoselectivity of HBV DNA polymerase (Schinazi et el., 1994;Furman et et., 1995) has provided the stimulation to synthesize the corresponding enantiomer as well as other~-L purine analogues. 3TC and its 5-fluoro derivative~-L-FTC are markedly more potent inhibitors than their o-enantiomer counterparts against both HIV (Coates et el., 1992;Schinazi et el., 1992) and HBV replication (Furman et el., 1992;Schinazi et el., 1992).…”
Section: Anti-hbv Activity Off3-l-dda and Derivatives 277mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have demonstrated potent and highly selective anti-HIV and anti-HBV activities in vitro in several human cell lines and in vivo (Coates et a/., 1992;Furman et a/., 1992Furman et a/., , 1995Schinazi et ei., 1992;van Draanen et a/., 1994;Gosselin et a/., 1994a,b;Lin et el., 1994;Schinazi et sl., 1994;Mansour et el., 1995). On the basis of this finding, novel series of purine~-L-2',3'-dideoxynucleoside analogues were synthesized in order to evaluate their potential anti-HBV activity in the HBV DNA-transfected human hepatoblastoma-derived Hep-G2 cells (2.2.15 cells) and to study their potential structure-activity relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LddA (β-L-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine) also presents a fairly important anti-HBV activity in infected cell systems (Bolon et al, 1996). The enantiomers of the guanosine analogue carbovir (CBV) have different levels of activity, the natural β-D-enantiomer being active against HIV and the β-L-enantiomer against HBV (Furman et al, 1995).…”
Section: L-nucleoside Analogues With Antiviral (Anti-hiv or Anti-hbv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, cellular deoxycytidine kinase has a considerably relaxed enantioselectivity with respect to a large number of nucleosides or their analogues, and it occupies a strategic position in the intracellular activation of Introduction Hutchinson, 1990;Mahmoudian et al, 1993). Lately, however, the enantioselectivity of some of these enzymes has been questioned and recognized as an important factor for the recently disclosed antiviral activity of several L-nucleoside analogues, especially against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) (Furman et al, 1995). It is now accepted that these activities may resultat least in part -from the relaxed enantioselectivities of the target viral enzymes or the cellular enzymes which activate or deactivate the nucleoside analogues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%