2017
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Access to Electronic Health Records on Throughput Efficiency and Imaging Utilization in the Emergency Department

Abstract: EHR availability for ED patients is associated with a reduction in CT scans and cost savings but had no impact on throughput time or order frequency of other imaging studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Other studies have reported that the introduction of EHR may result in less orders for unnecessary tests and imaging and can possibly influence confidence in diagnosis. 17,18 The difficulty in reaching a conclusion as to benefits of EHR is due to multiple factors, these include a wide spectrum of commercially available EHR systems, mixed taxonomy utilized by different studies, intrinsic site and utilization differences and an absence of standardized measure in the assessment of EHR performance. 19 A systematic review found that the same taxonomy in EHR literature had variable meanings depending on the author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Other studies have reported that the introduction of EHR may result in less orders for unnecessary tests and imaging and can possibly influence confidence in diagnosis. 17,18 The difficulty in reaching a conclusion as to benefits of EHR is due to multiple factors, these include a wide spectrum of commercially available EHR systems, mixed taxonomy utilized by different studies, intrinsic site and utilization differences and an absence of standardized measure in the assessment of EHR performance. 19 A systematic review found that the same taxonomy in EHR literature had variable meanings depending on the author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that there may be improvements in length of stay, mortality, inpatient rate of infections, adherence to guidelines, rate of medication errors, costs and utilization of physician time . Other studies have reported that the introduction of EHR may result in less orders for unnecessary tests and imaging and can possibly influence confidence in diagnosis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence on the effects of HIT on efficiency also shows mixed results. HIT is found to reduce costs [2] [30] [36] [38] and the number of radiology exams [37] [38]. However, studies also suggest that HIT increases hospital costs and nurse staffing levels [6] [29].…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a complete overview of the studies and these effects of HIT, see Table 3. no effect [38] Table 3. HIT functionalities and effects on medical professional satisfaction.…”
Section: Medical Professional Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the studies from the current literature exhibited a trend that EHR adoption and financial outcomes have a nonlinear relationship [16,17], and some of the studies indicated that EHR adoption resulted in improved financial outcomes for health care organizations that adopted it over time [14,18]. The literature suggests that improvement in costs and revenues is the result of improved clinical outcomes such as reduction of redundant tests [19], reduction of medication and hospital bed-related costs [20], improved ability to capture charges [15], and improved decision support systems [21]. Since this study focuses on combining both financial and clinical outcomes into 1 conceptual model, for the purpose of this study, the capital project investment (EHR adoption in this case) and improvement in financial returns (financial outcomes), tenets of the corporate financial theory of the firm, with an addition of the clinical outcomes, are integrated into a conceptual framework.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%