The Effect of Acute Exercise on Smoking Topography: No Evidence for Cutting Down One Puff at a Time

Schneider, Terri; Jesus, Stefanie De; Prapavessis, Harry

doi:10.1017/jsc.2014.2

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the included studies, 21 focused on acute exercise interventions with a duration of 5–30 min ( Ussher et al, 2001 ; Taylor et al, 2005 ; Taylor et al, 2006 ; Ussher et al, 2006 ; Taylor and Katomeri, 2007 ; Everson et al, 2008 ; Van Rensburg and Taylor, 2008 ; Van Rensburg et al, 2009a ; Van Rensburg et al, 2009b ; Ussher et al, 2009 ; Faulkner et al, 2010 ; Scerbo et al, 2010 ; Van Rensburg et al, 2012 ; Van Rensburg et al, 2013 ; Fong et al, 2014 ; Oh and Taylor, 2014 ; Schneider et al, 2015 ; Tritter et al, 2015 ; De Jesus and Prapavessis, 2018 ; Jeffries et al, 2020 ; Masiero et al, 2020 ). The remaining 19 studies involved long-term exercise interventions ranging from 4 to 19 weeks ( Hill, 1985 ; Hill et al, 1993 ; Marcus et al, 1995 ; Marcus et al, 1999 ; Marcus et al, 2005 ; Prapavessis et al, 2007 ; Al-Chalabi et al, 2008 ; Kinnunen et al, 2008 ; Bize et al, 2010 ; Williams et al, 2010 ; Ciccolo et al, 2011 ; Bock et al, 2012 ; Linke et al, 2012 ; Whiteley et al, 2012 ; Abrantes et al, 2014 ; Abrantes et al, 2018 ; Cheung et al, 2020 ; Oncken et al, 2020 ; Dunsiger et al, 2021 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Smokers’ cravings were assessed using two Likert scales: desire to smoke (DtS) and strength of desire (SoD). A total of 15 RCTs (749 participants in total, with 385 in the exercise group and 364 in the control group) were included for DtS ( Ussher et al, 2001 ; Taylor et al, 2006 ; Taylor and Katomeri, 2007 ; Van Rensburg and Taylor, 2008 ; Van Rensburg et al, 2009a ; Van Rensburg et al, 2009b ; Faulkner et al, 2010 ; Scerbo et al, 2010 ; Schneider et al, 2015 ; Tritter et al, 2015 ; De Jesus and Prapavessis, 2018 ; Jeffries et al, 2020 ; Masiero et al, 2020 ). Ten studies measuring SoD were included ( Ussher et al, 2001 ; Taylor et al, 2005 ; Ussher et al, 2006 ; Taylor and Katomeri, 2007 ; Everson et al, 2008 ; Ussher et al, 2009 ; Scerbo et al, 2010 ; Van Rensburg et al, 2012 ; Fong et al, 2014 ; Oh and Taylor, 2014 ), involving a total of 554 participants (273 in the exercise group and 281 in the control group).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of exercise intervention on smoking cessation: a meta-analysis

Zhou¹,

Feng²,

Guo³

et al. 2023

Front. Physiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Exercise has emerged as an effective approach to promote individual health and has shown potential in aiding smoking cessation. However, the specific benefits of exercise in smoking cessation remain unclear, and conflicting findings across studies may be attributed to variations in study populations and intervention characteristics. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of exercise interventions on tobacco dependence in smokers and assess the effectiveness of exercise in facilitating smoking cessation.Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify relevant randomized controlled trials published before 30 October 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during the review process. The quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed with GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations) methodology.Results: Acute exercise was found to significantly reduce smoking cravings [MD = −1.84, 95% CI (−2.92, −0.76), p < 0.001; SMD = −1.64, 95% CI (−2.22, −1.05), p < 0.001] and alleviate most withdrawal symptoms in smokers. However, there was no significant difference in the smoking cessation rate between the exercise group and the control group (p > 0.05). Exercise was associated with increased positive mood [SMD = 0.36, 95% CI (0.14, 0.58), p = 0.001] and reduced negative mood in smokers [SMD = −0.26, 95% CI (−0.39, −0.12), p < 0.001].Conclusion: Acute exercise interventions effectively reduce cravings and withdrawal symptoms in smokers. However, long-term exercise interventions do not significantly improve the smoking cessation rate. Exercise can help reduce negative mood and enhance positive mood in smokers. Smokers with high levels of tobacco dependence may derive less benefit from exercise. Factors such as literature quality, exercise intervention characteristics, and exercise adherence may influence the effectiveness of interventions.Trial registration: This research protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). Registration number: CRD42022326109.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of exercise intervention on smoking cessation: a meta-analysis

Zhou¹,

Feng²,

Guo³

et al. 2023

Front. Physiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additional future research should examine the procedure's control of topography when smoking or vaping under different environmental manipulations, 9,10 such as those causing acute negative affect. 45 Toward that end, and to conduct such assessments under more naturalistic conditions, our PowerPoint-driven topography instructions could be modified and administered by smart phones for use during mobile assessment of inhaled product use while controlling topography 46,47 with or without including the CReSS Pocket device.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Relevant studies here are far more common for tobacco smoking, such as those examining variable responding to specific levels of smoking exposure as functions of individual differences, concurrent environmental conditions, differences in the cigarette's constituents, or other manipulations. Examples include research on responding due to static individual difference factors of high or low dependence, 6 menthol or nonmenthol preference, 7 or subject sex 8 ; contextual factors of testing location, 9 concurrently engaging in exercise, 10 or pretreatment with medications 11 ; and controlled variations in nicotine or other content of tobacco in test cigarettes. 12,13 Similarly observed variations in amount of self-administered exposure and in differential responses to exposure have been found in acute tests with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Procedure to Standardize Puff Topography During Evaluations of Acute Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Exposure

Perkins

Karelitz

2018

Nicotine &Amp; Tobacco Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Documenting factors that influence differential sensitivity to acutely inhaled nicotine products requires carefully controlling the amount of exposure (dose), and thus a procedure by which to control such exposure. Methods We evaluated consistency of puff volume from intermittent acute exposures to smoked tobacco cigarettes (study 1, n = 45, plus a comparison study of uninstructed use with n = 59) and to vaped electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes; study 2, n = 27 naive to e-cigarettes) in adult-dependent smokers. All in primary studies 1 and 2 participated in research administering different nicotine levels in each product under blind conditions, one per session using within-subject designs. In both studies, participants followed an automated instructional procedure on a computer monitor standardizing the timing and amount of exposure to each product during a given trial, with four trials per session, each separated by 20 minutes. Puff volume per trial via Clinical Research Support System (CReSS) was the primary dependent measure to determine consistency across trials via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Control over topography with both inhaled products was demonstrated by highly significant ICCs for puff volume across trials. Instructed control with own brand was generally better in study 1 than with uninstructed smoking in the comparison sample, as expected. As intended, reliability of puff volume generally did not differ by menthol preference or sex in either study, but ICCs in study 2 tended to be lower for some men using the placebo e-cigarette. Conclusions This instructional procedure may substantially improve control over amounts of acute exposure to tobacco or e-cigarette use. Implications Control over topography in studies of acute exposure to these inhaled products can potentially aid validity of research into differential sensitivity to use, so findings can be attributed to factors of interest and not to variable exposure. Our procedure minimized variability in exposure to the same product and between moderate nicotine products, but remaining differences suggest that compensation for very low or no nicotine commercial products may be difficult to totally eliminate with these instructions alone. Further study is needed to determine this procedure’s utility with other inhaled products among experienced users and when comparing different products in between-groups analyses.

show abstract

The Effect of Acute Exercise on Smoking Topography: No Evidence for Cutting Down One Puff at a Time

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

Effect of exercise intervention on smoking cessation: a meta-analysis

Effect of exercise intervention on smoking cessation: a meta-analysis

A Procedure to Standardize Puff Topography During Evaluations of Acute Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Exposure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About