1967
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of adaptation on taste jnds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the effect was modest (approximately 0.5 dB on average), and varied from subject to subject, the same general pattern of results was obtained in all three subjects. Similar adaptation-produced sharpening of discriminative ability has previously been demonstrated in audition (von B6k6sy, 1929/1960), vision (Greenlee and Heitger, 1988;Ranke, 1952;Beverly, 1983, 1985), and taste (McBurney et al, 1967). Its extension here to vibrotaction suggests that it is a general principle of sensory adjustment to environmental stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…While the effect was modest (approximately 0.5 dB on average), and varied from subject to subject, the same general pattern of results was obtained in all three subjects. Similar adaptation-produced sharpening of discriminative ability has previously been demonstrated in audition (von B6k6sy, 1929/1960), vision (Greenlee and Heitger, 1988;Ranke, 1952;Beverly, 1983, 1985), and taste (McBurney et al, 1967). Its extension here to vibrotaction suggests that it is a general principle of sensory adjustment to environmental stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Between stimuli the participant rinsed the mouth with distilled water. Each stimulus was separated by a minimum of 30 s to minimize adaptation (Bartoshuk et al, 1964;McBurney et al, 1967).…”
Section: Psychophysical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the frequency of a correct response in the method of constant stimuli increases as a normal integral with respect to ΔX, at least for small values of ΔX (e.g., [79,83,84], [85]-data re-presented in [86,87]- [88,89]). It follows that d' increases in proportion to ΔX, and if ΔX θ is the value of ΔX affording 84% correct responses (equivalent to d' = 1), (ΔX θ ) -2 is proportional to the divergence of the discrimination.…”
Section: Combining Information From Different Sensory Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%