2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-008-0752-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of additional equilibrium stress functions on the three-node hybrid-mixed curved beam element

Abstract: To develop an effective hybrid-mixed element, it is extremely critical as to how to assume the stress field. This research article demonstrates the effect of additional equilibrium stress functions to enhance the numerical performance of the locking-free three-node hybrid-mixed curved beam element, proposed in Saleeb and Chang's previous work. It is exceedingly complicated or even infeasible to determine the stress functions to satisfy fully both the equilibrium conditions and suppression of kinematic deformat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this obstacle, the number of nodes and order of functions were increased Ashwell and Sabir (1971) Dawe (1974) Meck (1980). Reduced integration assumed strain function and hybrid-mixed formulation are the other methods for creating locking-free elements Stolarski and Belytschko (1982) Pandian et al (1989) Lim (1993 and Yang and Sin (1995) Kim and Park (2008) Benedetti and Tralli (1989) Kim and Kim (1998) Kim and Lee (2008). Raveendranath and his colleagues (1999) assumed cubic polynomial for radial displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this obstacle, the number of nodes and order of functions were increased Ashwell and Sabir (1971) Dawe (1974) Meck (1980). Reduced integration assumed strain function and hybrid-mixed formulation are the other methods for creating locking-free elements Stolarski and Belytschko (1982) Pandian et al (1989) Lim (1993 and Yang and Sin (1995) Kim and Park (2008) Benedetti and Tralli (1989) Kim and Kim (1998) Kim and Lee (2008). Raveendranath and his colleagues (1999) assumed cubic polynomial for radial displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%