2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of additional weight load on infant reaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is not in line with the study by Rocha et al (2009), in which it was found that a weight of 10% the arm mass did not influence the grasping movement in full-term infants. The authors concluded that the amount of weight used was insufficient to change the dynamics of this variable.…”
Section: Graspingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result is not in line with the study by Rocha et al (2009), in which it was found that a weight of 10% the arm mass did not influence the grasping movement in full-term infants. The authors concluded that the amount of weight used was insufficient to change the dynamics of this variable.…”
Section: Graspingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…There is a consensus in literature that additional weight leads to increased neural activation (Fleck & Kraemer, 2004;Rocha et al, 2009;Thelen, Skala, & Kelso, 1987) by increasing the motor units involved in the action to support the additional weight, thus leading to increased muscle fiber recruitment. A fact that remains unclear in literature is how much weight is required for the neural activation caused by the additional weight to modify the reaching parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the dynamic system approach, motor behavior is shaped by the interaction between intrinsic and extrinsic factors ( Thelen, 1989( Thelen, , 1995Thelen & Smith, 1994 ). Consequently, extrinsic disturbances such as additional weight load attached to the upper limbs may infl uence the possibilities of actions on objects ( Thelen, Skala, & Kelso, 1987;Out, Savelsbergh, van Soest, & Hopkins, 1997;Rocha, Costa, Savelsbergh, & Tudella, 2009 ), such as increasing errors and dropping or hindering movements, as the limb is heavier, which may favor learning of how to control actions on objects that weigh more.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%