2001
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/70119/2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of additives on palatability, voluntary intake and digestibility of lucerne and whole-crop oat silages

Abstract: Second-cut lucerne media (Medicago media Pers var. Radius) harvested at the budding stage was ensiled with whole-crop oats (var. Santor), cut at milk stage, at a 75:25 or 50:50 (wt/wt) ratio. Additionally, each combination was conserved with or without an enzyme-bacterial additive (Goldzym). The experimental silages were: lucerne, 75 + whole-crop oats, 25; lucerne, 50 + whole-crop oats, 50; lucerne, 75 + whole-crop oats, 25 + Goldzym; lucerne, 50 + whole-crop oats, 50 + Goldzym. The experiment was conducted on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it seems unlikely that the samples were so little differentiated, considering that they belonged to samples derived from varieties with different precociousness, with different DM levels, cultivated under stressful or very favourable conditions and collected both before or after the 33% milk line phase. It seems therefore that FZS was able to sufficiently detect differences in the quality of fermentations between samples obtained in field conditions, as also noted by other authors (Borowiec et al, 2001), but it was not suitable in detecting differences between samples obtained under standardized or slightly differentiated conditions, as also detected by Gallo and colleagues (2016b) for the difference between samples collected at the centre or at the sides of the silo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it seems unlikely that the samples were so little differentiated, considering that they belonged to samples derived from varieties with different precociousness, with different DM levels, cultivated under stressful or very favourable conditions and collected both before or after the 33% milk line phase. It seems therefore that FZS was able to sufficiently detect differences in the quality of fermentations between samples obtained in field conditions, as also noted by other authors (Borowiec et al, 2001), but it was not suitable in detecting differences between samples obtained under standardized or slightly differentiated conditions, as also detected by Gallo and colleagues (2016b) for the difference between samples collected at the centre or at the sides of the silo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Given the importance of maize silage in cattle feeding and the impact that its quality can have on animal health and animal productions, in this study we wanted to test some new indexes for the evaluation of maize silage quality, comparing them with the Flieg-Zimmer's Score, an index widely used for the evaluation of maize silage (Borowiec et al, 2001;Gallo et al, 2016a). We also wanted to test the reliability of FZS on lab-scale maize silages, as these silages are now widely used in research, to test for example different cultivars, the use of inocula, nutrient losses, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%