2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of advection at luminosities close to Eddington: The ULX in M 31

Abstract: The transient, ultra-luminous X-ray source CXOM31 J004253.1+411422 in the Andromeda galaxy is most likely a 10 solar mass black hole, with super-Eddington luminosity at its peak. The XMM-Newton spectra taken during the decline then trace luminosities of 0.86−0.27 L Edd . These spectra are all dominated by a hot disc component, which roughly follows a constant inner radius track in luminosity and temperature as the source declines. At the highest luminosity the disc structure should change due to advection of r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not the spectrum that would be expected from an accretion flow radiating at ∼Eddington, which should be dominated by emission from a multi-color blackbody accretion disk, modified slightly by the effects of photon advection (e.g. Middleton et al 2012Middleton et al , 2013Straub et al 2013). In addition, spectra this hard (particularly in the Γ ∼ 1.1 case) are difficult to produce via Compton scattering of thermal disk photons in a standard accretion disk corona.…”
Section: Jet Activitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is not the spectrum that would be expected from an accretion flow radiating at ∼Eddington, which should be dominated by emission from a multi-color blackbody accretion disk, modified slightly by the effects of photon advection (e.g. Middleton et al 2012Middleton et al , 2013Straub et al 2013). In addition, spectra this hard (particularly in the Γ ∼ 1.1 case) are difficult to produce via Compton scattering of thermal disk photons in a standard accretion disk corona.…”
Section: Jet Activitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…other ULXs in the past (Mizuno et al 2007;Middleton et al 2011b;Straub et al 2013). The deviation of p from 0.5 in the brightest observation might imply some reprocessing of the disk emission, for example by a corona.…”
Section: Ngc 1313 X-2mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As discussed in McClintock et al (2006), above ∼30% of the Eddington limit, the spectra may deviate from that expected from a simple thin disc possibly due to the creation of an inner, optically thick, radiation pressure dominated corona/slim disc due to the high mass accretion rates (Abramowicz et al 1988; Ueda et al 2009;Middleton et al 2012;2013) or a region supported by magnetic pressure (Straub, Done & Middleton 2013). It is assumed that either disc truncation or simply a cooling of the disc photons by the corona leads to a lower disc temperature than should be expected from the innermost edge of the disc and a deviation away from the expected L ∝ T 4 relation ).…”
Section: Continuum Fittingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This model once again does not account for mass loss in a wind but accounts for three key components in high mass accretion rate ADAFs, the radial advection of heat and subsequent change in the emissivity, the position of the inner edge (which can move from the marginally stable to marginally bound orbit: Abramowicz et al 1988) and the location of the effective photosphere. A later version of this code, SLIMBH (Straub, Done & Middleton 2013), incorporates the TLUSTY stellar atmosphere code directly and so is closer in nature to BHSPEC. Unlike the case for high mass accretion rate ADAFs, the emission from low accretion rate ADAF/RIAFs may arise from synchrotron cooling in radiatively inefficient jets (Fender, There is also a more fundamental assumption that goes into models that derive from the Novikov & Thorne (1973) prescription: real accretion discs will have a finite thickness and will not behave as if razor thin. Paczyński (2000) and Afshordi & Paczyński (2003) argue for a monotonically decreasing deviation with decreasing scale-height for small α.…”
Section: Beyond the Simple Picturementioning
confidence: 99%