2012
DOI: 10.1071/wf11063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of aerial suppression on the containment time of Australian wildfires estimated by fire management personnel

Abstract: The addition of aerial firefighting resources to wildfire suppression operations does not always result in faster fire containment. In this paper, containment times of fires with aerial suppression are compared with estimated containment times for the same fires without aerial suppression. Senior firefighting personnel who had worked on each fire estimated whether fires could have been contained within a time class if aircraft were not available. Data from 251 wildfires were analysed based on four fire-contain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily the focus has been to use planned burning to reduce the risk from fire to human life and property situated within or adjacent to native vegetation (Fernandes and Botelho 2003;Penman et al 2011). However, additional strategies are often adopted by agencies to protect life and property such as mechanical fuel treatments (Syphard et al 2011;Syphard et al 2012;North et al 2015), community engagement (Eriksen and Prior 2013;Penman et al 2015a) and fire suppression (Calkin et al 2005;Plucinski et al 2012;Penman et al 2013b;Penman et al 2014). Several studies in Australia have found that while planned burning may reduce the extent of wildfire, the net effect is an increase in overall fire extent and frequency (Boer et al 2009;King et al 2013;Price 2015) leading to the emergence of new landscape fire regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily the focus has been to use planned burning to reduce the risk from fire to human life and property situated within or adjacent to native vegetation (Fernandes and Botelho 2003;Penman et al 2011). However, additional strategies are often adopted by agencies to protect life and property such as mechanical fuel treatments (Syphard et al 2011;Syphard et al 2012;North et al 2015), community engagement (Eriksen and Prior 2013;Penman et al 2015a) and fire suppression (Calkin et al 2005;Plucinski et al 2012;Penman et al 2013b;Penman et al 2014). Several studies in Australia have found that while planned burning may reduce the extent of wildfire, the net effect is an increase in overall fire extent and frequency (Boer et al 2009;King et al 2013;Price 2015) leading to the emergence of new landscape fire regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, wildfire accidents, particularly those caused by humans, have become more common in recent years (Plucinski et al 2012;Page et al 2014;Krawchuk and Moritz 2014). For example, from 2000 to 2013, there were 115,466 wildfires in China, the majority of which were due to human activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions associated with low severity fire (e.g. moderate fire weather, riparian areas, young fuels) may facilitate fire suppression (Kauffman 2001;Plucinski et al 2012). By contrast, crown fires occurring at the wildland-urban interface can have disastrous implications in terms of loss of life and property .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%