The Effect of Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Polarization Pattern Perception

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine if a battery of polarization-modulated stimuli, quantified as a single metric, is effective in identifying macular disease in the presence/absence of cataract or pseudophakia. Methods Using a modified liquid crystal display, polarization pattern perception (PPP) for a formulated battery of geometric and logMAR stimuli was evaluated in participants that had either no eye pathology (healthy participants) or were grouped according to the presence of cataract, pseudophakia, and/or age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PPP was quantified as response frequencies to individual stimuli, and as a novel monocular polarization sensitivity score ( Ps ) based on perception of the stimulus battery set. Results Stimulus response frequencies were pattern-dependent and, compared with healthy participants, reduced for cataract and AMD groups but not for subjects with pseudophakia. Compared with healthy eyes ( n = 47, median Ps = 17), Ps was significantly reduced by AMD ( n = 59, median Ps = 1, P < 0.001) and, to a lesser extent, by cataracts ( n = 80, median Ps = 6, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between Ps for healthy and pseudophakic eyes ( n = 47, median Ps = 13, P = 0.323). There was no significant correlation between Ps and logMAR visual acuity. Conclusions In the absence of significant cataract, or in pseudophakia, a set of polarization-modulated visual stimuli, quantified as the Ps score, distinguishes AMD from healthy maculae. Translational Relevance Perception of polarization-modulated stimuli, previously shown to be macula-dependent in a laboratory setting, is effective as a test of macular function in health and disease in a clinic setting.

Structured light enhanced entoptic stimuli for vision science applications

“…Haidinger's brush has been employed as a diagnostic marker in studies of age-related macular degeneration (Forster, 1954 ; Naylor and Stanworth, 1955 ; Müller et al, 2016 ; Misson et al, 2020 , 2021 ). A major focus is on determining the time period between polarization-based vision loss and normal vision loss in people suffering from AMD.…”