2016
DOI: 10.3386/w22753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Air Pollution on Investor Behavior: Evidence from the S&P 500

Abstract: at Madison and CIRANO Montreal for constructive discussions. Errors are ours. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pollution.-Recent research points to a possible link from short-term pollution exposure to mood and cognitive function, either of which might influence decision outcomes (Heyes et al 2016;and Szyszkowicz et al 2010). While our main specifications include controls for ambient levels of the main pollutants ( O 3 , P M 2.5 , and CO ), concern may remain that we have failed to control adequately for air-quality effects, and that these are confounding our results.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pollution.-Recent research points to a possible link from short-term pollution exposure to mood and cognitive function, either of which might influence decision outcomes (Heyes et al 2016;and Szyszkowicz et al 2010). While our main specifications include controls for ambient levels of the main pollutants ( O 3 , P M 2.5 , and CO ), concern may remain that we have failed to control adequately for air-quality effects, and that these are confounding our results.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…measures, and exposure levels. Recent work has linked exposure to ozone with reductions in the productivity of agricultural workers (Graff Zivin & Neidell, 2012), whereas increased levels of ambient particulate matter have been linked to reductions in the performance of warehouse workers (Chang, Graff Zivin, Gross, & Neidell, 2016a), call center staffers (Chang, Zivin, Gross, & Neidell, 2016b), industrial workers (He, Liu, & Salvo, 2016), soccer players (Lichter, Pestel, & Sommer, 2017), and possibly participants in equity markets (Heyes, Neidell, & Saberian, 2016). Together, these findings suggest that air pollution imposes significant societal costs through channels beyond those measurable via administrative mortality and morbidity outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the effect of air pollution represented by PM on socioeconomic activities, Ebenstein et al (2016) find that a higher level of PM 2.5 exposure during test exams can cause a significant decline in test scores. Heyes et al (2016) measure the effects of air pollution (PM 2.5 ) in the Manhattan area on investment returns in the New York Stock Exchange. Li et al (2017) highlight the impact of air pollution on labor outflow and labor migration in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heyes et al . () measure the effects of air pollution (PM 2.5 ) in the Manhattan area on investment returns in the New York Stock Exchange. Li et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%