2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of air–water interface on the vortex shedding from a vertical circular cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, near the free surface the drag coefficient decreases rapidly, a trend that is consistent with previous studies found in the literature, e.g. Chaplin and Teigen (2003), Kawamura et al (2002), Yu et al (2008), Suh et al (2011). Additionally, an increase in the drag coefficient can be seen at the bottom of the cylinder where the flow is altered due to the tip vortices from the free end.…”
Section: Sectional Forcessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, near the free surface the drag coefficient decreases rapidly, a trend that is consistent with previous studies found in the literature, e.g. Chaplin and Teigen (2003), Kawamura et al (2002), Yu et al (2008), Suh et al (2011). Additionally, an increase in the drag coefficient can be seen at the bottom of the cylinder where the flow is altered due to the tip vortices from the free end.…”
Section: Sectional Forcessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Numerical work on the drag coefficients of surface-piercing cylinders has been carried out by Kawamura et al (2002), Yu et al (2008) and Suh et al (2011). In each of the papers, the drag coefficient for the cylinder in the presence of a free surface was found to be smaller than the subcritical constant value of 1.2 at Reynolds numbers below 1.4 × 10 5 for a fully submerged cylinder.…”
Section: Surface-piercing Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 are similar to those from experiment and CFD simulation for a vertical cylinder in steady current [19]. For present case, however, Kevin wave pattern behind the cylinder is less clear and diffraction from the cylinder spreads further toward upstream, which is attributed to high Re and low Fr compared to Re = 2.7 × 10 4 and Fr = 0.8 in [19].…”
Section: Wave Diffraction Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The CFDShip-Iowa V6.2 [22] is an orthogonal curvilinear grid solver, which is extended from the sharp interface Cartesian grid solver (Version 6.1) for incompressible two-phase viscous flows recently developed at the University of Iowa [23]. In this solver, the interface is tracked by a new volume-of-fluid (VOF) method [24].…”
Section: Cfdship-iowa V62mentioning
confidence: 99%