2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of alcohol administration on human timing: A comparison of prospective timing, retrospective timing and passage of time judgements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
24
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, our understanding of the role of executive functions in timing is largely limited to the role of executive functions in these two motor timing tasks. This is problematic because different temporal tasks do not always demonstrate the same behavioural effects, perhaps indicating that different underlying mechanisms sub-serve each task Block et al, 1998;Franssen & Vandierendonck, 2002;Gil & Droit-Volet, 2011;Mioni et al, 2013;Ogden & Jones, 2009;Ogden, Wearden, Gallagher, & Montgomery, 2011;Ulbrich, Churan, Fink, & Wittmann, 2007;Wearden et al, 2008;Wiener, Turkeltaub, & Coslett, 2009). For example, observed that working memory capacity influences reproduction but not production performance.…”
Section: Accessmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As a result, our understanding of the role of executive functions in timing is largely limited to the role of executive functions in these two motor timing tasks. This is problematic because different temporal tasks do not always demonstrate the same behavioural effects, perhaps indicating that different underlying mechanisms sub-serve each task Block et al, 1998;Franssen & Vandierendonck, 2002;Gil & Droit-Volet, 2011;Mioni et al, 2013;Ogden & Jones, 2009;Ogden, Wearden, Gallagher, & Montgomery, 2011;Ulbrich, Churan, Fink, & Wittmann, 2007;Wearden et al, 2008;Wiener, Turkeltaub, & Coslett, 2009). For example, observed that working memory capacity influences reproduction but not production performance.…”
Section: Accessmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Estimates of the duration of the random duration stimuli were collected as for the target stimuli, but these data were not analysed. The random duration stimuli were included to prevent participants from identifying the repeated target durations, particularly the shortest and longest ones, and using duration estimates at the lower and upper end of the range (Ogden, Wearden, Gallagher, & Montgomery, 2011). Five blocks were delivered in each condition giving a total of 55 trials per condition; the order of conditions was randomised for each participant.…”
Section: Verbal Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has recently been proposed that the hippocampus may be preferentially involved in retrospective timing, which is more dependent on incidental memory for the number and temporal sequence of events than prospective timing (e.g., MacDonald, 2013; Ogden, Wearden, Gallagher, & Montgomery, 2011; Zakay & Block, 2004). As such, the remainder of this commemorative retrospective will highlight subsequent work by members of the original team and/or their colleagues that investigate the role of cortico-thalamic-basal ganglia circuits in time perception and timed performance (e.g., Allman & Meck, 2012; Coull, Cheng, & Meck, 2011; Gibbon, Malapani, Dale, & Gallistel, 1997; Gu, Laubach, & Meck, 2013; Matell & Meck, 2004; Matell, 2013; Meck, 1996; Merchant, Harrington, & Meck, 2013; Yin & Meck, 2013).…”
Section: Search For Neural Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%