2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of alcohol on sexual risk-taking among young men and women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, gender differences in the associations between alcohol and other drug use and sexual risk behavior have been less consistent in the literature. In experimental studies, alcohol and placebo-condition men were less willing to engage in sex in a hypothetical encounter than were sober men, while the opposite was true for women, such that alcohol and placebo-condition women were more willing to engage in the hypothetical sex than sober women (Cho & Span, 2010). Among STD clinic patients, alcohol use was associated with risk behavior and STD diagnosis among women but unrelated to risk behavior and disease outcomes among men (Hutton, McCaul, Santora, & Erbelding, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, gender differences in the associations between alcohol and other drug use and sexual risk behavior have been less consistent in the literature. In experimental studies, alcohol and placebo-condition men were less willing to engage in sex in a hypothetical encounter than were sober men, while the opposite was true for women, such that alcohol and placebo-condition women were more willing to engage in the hypothetical sex than sober women (Cho & Span, 2010). Among STD clinic patients, alcohol use was associated with risk behavior and STD diagnosis among women but unrelated to risk behavior and disease outcomes among men (Hutton, McCaul, Santora, & Erbelding, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sexual double standard, different standards of sexual permissiveness for women and men, is widely internalized by women (Crawford & Popp, 2003), as it was in our sample. Importantly, women who expected drinking to resolve the dissonance between their sexual desire and their prohibitions against it have placed themselves in risky sexual situations where they could become impaired by alcohol's effects and experience adverse consequences (Cho & Span, 2010; Crowe & George, 1989; Fromme et al, 1999; Hendershot et al, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we recommend altering SRAEs by strengthening opposing behaviors and experiences. For example, interventions aimed at women could challenge the sexual double standard [80], the necessity to consume alcohol to justify having sex (Cho & Span, 2010; Leigh, 1990) or the reliance on alcohol to enhance the sexual experience (Messman-Moore, Ward, & DeNardi, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding resonates with the triad of alcohol, sex, and tourism that has been widely highlighted in the literature (Apostolopoulos et al, 2002;Berdychevsky et al, 2010;Diken & Laustsen, 2004;Maticka-Tyndale & Herold, 1997;Maticka-Tyndale et al, 2003;Mewhinney et al, 1995;Thomas, 2000). Considering the disinhibiting role of alcohol uncovered in this study, it is important to mention that sexual risktaking in adolescence frequently occurs in conjunction with alcohol consumption (Brookmeyer & Henrich, 2009;Cho & Span, 2010;Wade & Heldman, 2012). The findings also emphasized the expectancy effect, as opposed to the pharmacological intoxication effect (Cho & Span, 2010), providing women with a psychological excuse for sexual risk-taking in tourism.…”
Section: The Role Of Touristic Contexts In Understanding Women's Sexumentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Considering the disinhibiting role of alcohol uncovered in this study, it is important to mention that sexual risktaking in adolescence frequently occurs in conjunction with alcohol consumption (Brookmeyer & Henrich, 2009;Cho & Span, 2010;Wade & Heldman, 2012). The findings also emphasized the expectancy effect, as opposed to the pharmacological intoxication effect (Cho & Span, 2010), providing women with a psychological excuse for sexual risk-taking in tourism. This expectancy effect partially alleviates responsibility for sexual behaviors that might not fit a woman's script as dictated by sexual double standards (Eaton & Rose, 2011;Jonason & Fisher, 2009;McCabe et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Touristic Contexts In Understanding Women's Sexumentioning
confidence: 87%