The effect of AM noise on correlation phase-noise measurements

Abstract

We analyze the phase-noise measurement methods in which correlation and averaging is used to reject the background noise of the instrument. All the known methods make use of a mixer, used either as a saturated phase detector or as a linear synchronous detector. Unfortunately, AM noise is taken in through the power-to-dc-offset conversion mechanism that results from the mixer asymmetry. The measurement of some mixers indicates that the unwanted amplitude-to-voltage gain is of the order of 5-50 mV, which is 12-35 dB lower than the phase-to-voltage gain of the mixer. In addition, the trick of setting the mixer at a sweet point-off the quadrature condition-where the sensitivity to AM nulls, works only with microwave mixers. The HF-VHF mixers have not this sweet point. Moreover, we prove that if the AM noise comes from the oscillator under test, it can not be rejected by correlation. At least not with the schemes currently used. An example shows that at some critical frequencies the unwanted effect of AM noise is of the same order-if not greater-than the phase noise. Thus, experimental mistakes are around the corner.

Ultra-low phase noise frequency synthesis chains for high-performance vapor cell atomic clocks

“…Measurements are performed with a signal source analyzer (Agilent E5052B) [14], [15]. For f < 10 kHz, the 200 MHz signal phase noise is as expected 6 dB higher than the 100 MHz signal phase noise.…”

A collapse of the cross-spectral function in phase noise metrology

“…This commonly occurs when amplitude modulation (AM) noise from a source contaminates a phase modulation (PM) measurement via an imperfect mixer. [17][18][19] Case iv (collapse of the cross-spectral function): However, if c(t) is correlated in x(t) and y(t) and d(t) is anticorrelated (phase inverted) in x and y an unexpected outcome occurs:…”

Phase noise measurement: Challenges and uncertainty

“…In the early time, the struggle for better instruments was driven by the idea that a mixer can be operated in a "sweet point" close to the quadrature, where the sensitivity to AM noise nulls [13]- [14]. Oppositely, < 0 means that the instrument systematically under-estimates the DUT noise, as a result of the disturbing signal d. In some extreme cases ܵ ௬௫ can collapse to zero [15]- [16], or even be negative, which is impossible for the DUT noise.…”