2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00724-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of an on-site trauma surgeon during resuscitations of severely injured patients

Abstract: Background Although the timely involvement of trauma surgeons is widely accepted as standard care in a trauma center, there is an ongoing debate regarding the value of an on-site attending trauma surgeon compared to an on-call trauma surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing an on-site trauma surgeons and the effect of their presence on the adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) related tasks and resuscitation pace in the trauma bay. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no statistically signi cant differences in patient age, gender, injury severity, or EMS prehospital time between the study cohorts (Table 1). There was statistically signi cant improvement in the T-NOTECHS score after the implementation of the SD: 12 [10][11][12][13][14] out of possible 25 points or 48% [40-56%] in the before SD group and 16 [14][15][16][17][18][19] points or 64% [56-75%] in the after SD group (p < 0.001). Comparison of the distribution in ve behavior domains between the study groups are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were no statistically signi cant differences in patient age, gender, injury severity, or EMS prehospital time between the study cohorts (Table 1). There was statistically signi cant improvement in the T-NOTECHS score after the implementation of the SD: 12 [10][11][12][13][14] out of possible 25 points or 48% [40-56%] in the before SD group and 16 [14][15][16][17][18][19] points or 64% [56-75%] in the after SD group (p < 0.001). Comparison of the distribution in ve behavior domains between the study groups are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a study by Scherer LA et al [18] it was reported that feedback with video tape review had a positive impact on breathing and circulation assessment as well as back examination [18]. Another study reported that having a trauma surgeon on site also increased the number of patients whose backs were examined [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Underscoring the importance of our study is the relatively recent focus on trauma-specific process improvement measures undertaken at institutions across the globe. Other methods for improving efficiency in the trauma bay that have been studied include standardizing trauma bay organization, having a trauma surgeon on-site, and establishing time goals for time spent during resuscitation and to disposition (Philipose et al, 2022; Taylor et al, 2020; van Maarseveen et al, 2022). Additionally, criteria have been developed to determine which trauma patients are at increased risk of emergent surgery to expedite them to the OR, with studies showing an improvement in survival (Johnson et al, 2020; Martin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lubbert et al, found a median of 32.9 min [ 11 ]. Van Maarseveen et al found mean resuscitation times of 23.4 and 19.1 min for severely injured patients (ISS ≥ 16) resuscitated in a setting with an on-call versus in-house trauma surgeon, respectively [ 15 ]. These shorter resuscitation times compared to our findings might plausibly be caused by differences in the severity of the included patients, as our study’s population median ISS of 5.5 (8.3) was relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%