2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of anions on the anodic formation of copper sulphide films on copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the location of the previously discussed base layer and its apparent thickness are indicated in Figure 8d, they are difficult to observe, owing to the presence of much larger features. The formation of such a thick crystalline outer deposit was consistent with our previous observations [ 6–15 ] and with our demonstration that growth of this deposit occurred at the film/solution interface, supported by the transport through the pores of the base layer of Cu(I), as both sulfide complexes (Cu(SH) 2 − ) and Cu 3 S 3 clusters, formed at the Cu surface. [ 15,24–29 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the location of the previously discussed base layer and its apparent thickness are indicated in Figure 8d, they are difficult to observe, owing to the presence of much larger features. The formation of such a thick crystalline outer deposit was consistent with our previous observations [ 6–15 ] and with our demonstration that growth of this deposit occurred at the film/solution interface, supported by the transport through the pores of the base layer of Cu(I), as both sulfide complexes (Cu(SH) 2 − ) and Cu 3 S 3 clusters, formed at the Cu surface. [ 15,24–29 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This decrease in plateau current density has been shown to be due to a competition between SH − and Cl − for adsorption sites on the Cu surface. [ 11 ] Although [SH − ] had been increased by an order of magnitude, the anodic current density remained the same on the reverse scan as it was on the forward scan, consistent with the presence of a porous film. [ 8 ] However, two cathodic reduction peaks were observed (regions C and D), suggesting the presence of either two distinct morphological forms of the same phase or, possibly, two different copper sulfide phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations