2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(08)60296-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Ankle Inclination in Supine and Standing Position on the Electromyigraphic Activity of Abdominal and Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women With and Without Stress Urinary Incontinence: Preliminary Results From a Pilot Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of two previous studies that examined the effect of ankle position on dynamic PFM activation in standing (Chen et al, 2005;Cerruto et al, 2008) conflict with the results of the current study. In both studies, the study design was based on the assumption that inducing passive ankle dorsiflexion (DF) with subjects in standing would facilitate an anterior pelvic tilt (hyperlordosis), and that inducing passive ankle plantarflexion (PF) would create a posterior pelvic tilt (hypolordosis).…”
Section: Pfm Activation Amplitudecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of two previous studies that examined the effect of ankle position on dynamic PFM activation in standing (Chen et al, 2005;Cerruto et al, 2008) conflict with the results of the current study. In both studies, the study design was based on the assumption that inducing passive ankle dorsiflexion (DF) with subjects in standing would facilitate an anterior pelvic tilt (hyperlordosis), and that inducing passive ankle plantarflexion (PF) would create a posterior pelvic tilt (hypolordosis).…”
Section: Pfm Activation Amplitudecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While the results of the current study support that there is decreased maximum voluntary activation of the PFM in the hypo-lordotic posture, there was also reduced PFM activation when MVCs were performed in the hyperlordotic posture. In the second study by Cerruto et al (2008) which was of similar design to that of Chen et al (2005), the authors reported that there were no differences in maximal PFM EMG activation when continent women stood with different ankle angles (n = 35). The results of Chen et al (2005) and Cerruto et al (2008) must be interpreted with caution, however, as neither group provided evidence that the changes in ankle position used in their studies actually induced significant changes in lumbopelvic posture.…”
Section: Pfm Activation Amplitudementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other studies found greater PFM activity in ankle neutral and induced dorsiflexion as opposed to induced plantar flexion [10,13]. As ankle positions can influence resting and MVC PFM, it is worth identifying the ankle position facilitating greater maximal contraction to aid PFM training for women with SUI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found that different ankle positions (dorsiflexion, neutral and plantar flexion) alter PFM activity in women, but with contradictory results [10][11][12][13][14]. Some studies found significantly greater PFM activity in induced ankle plantar flexion (wedges under heels) compared to ankle neutral and induced dorsiflexion (placing wedges under toes) [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%