2017
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.75174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Anterior-Posterior Spread and Cantilever Length on the Supporting Structures of Maxillary Screw Retained Prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients receiving screw retained prosthesis with a ratio of 1:2 cantilever length using standard implant diameter(3.7mm), bone height changes were recorded to be 1.33±0.24mm. A clinical important difference based on expert opinion = 0.4., this is the least acceptable difference between the two groups 15 . Independent-t-test with a power of 80% and 0.05 alpha significance was used for sample size calculation, and 7 patients were reported in each group, with a total of 14 patients.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients receiving screw retained prosthesis with a ratio of 1:2 cantilever length using standard implant diameter(3.7mm), bone height changes were recorded to be 1.33±0.24mm. A clinical important difference based on expert opinion = 0.4., this is the least acceptable difference between the two groups 15 . Independent-t-test with a power of 80% and 0.05 alpha significance was used for sample size calculation, and 7 patients were reported in each group, with a total of 14 patients.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Khorshid et al compared the bone height changes between two different diameters with different cantilever length after 24 month follow up period 15 . In patients receiving screw retained prosthesis with a ratio of 1:2 cantilever length using standard implant diameter(3.7mm), bone height changes were recorded to be 1.33±0.24mm.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculation was performed according to a study 19 that compared the marginal bone height changes around implants supporting full arch maxillary prostheses placed with different cantilever length after a two year follow up period. A clinical important difference based on expert opinion of 0.4 was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%