2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000142396.59236.f3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of anti-L-selectin (aselizumab) in multiple traumatized patients—Results of a phase II clinical trial*

Abstract: Aselizumab was associated with a higher rate of infections and leucopenia; however, this difference was not significantly different compared with placebo. For all efficacy variables, aselizumab presented no significant trends but only a few scattered statistically significant differences between groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adhesion blocking strategies have been attempted in humans with limited success. In a phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 84 trauma patients, intravenous aselizumab (humanized monoclonal anti-L-selectin antibody) did not alter adverse outcomes related to multi-organ failure and ALI [42 ]. There was a trend towards increased infection rates and leucopenia, however.…”
Section: Integrinsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Adhesion blocking strategies have been attempted in humans with limited success. In a phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 84 trauma patients, intravenous aselizumab (humanized monoclonal anti-L-selectin antibody) did not alter adverse outcomes related to multi-organ failure and ALI [42 ]. There was a trend towards increased infection rates and leucopenia, however.…”
Section: Integrinsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Of note, available clinical data suggest that anti selectin drug delivery directly to the target organ (e.g., cylexin in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit [128] or inhaled/ subcutaneous bimosiamose [129][130][131][132]) is more effective than the systemic treatment [123][124][125][126]. However, these results may be ascribed to the fact that, apart from GMI-1070, pan-selectin therapies were never tested systemically, like antiselectin antibodies or PSGL-1-Ig fusion protein [123][124][125][126]. Pan-selectin antagonists may overcome the functional redundancy among selectins in leukocyte trafficking, being a more powerful tool for the inhibition of selectin-mediated adhesion during inflammatory pathologies (also discussed in [132]).…”
Section: Antiselectin Therapeutic Aproachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, intravenous treatment with a humanized anti-E-sel antibody (CDP850) was not effective in ameliorating the clinical outcome in patients with psoriasis, whereas therapy with aselizumab, a humanized mono clonal anti-L-sel antibody, did not protect patients from multiple organ failures after trauma and was associated with an increased risk of infections [123,124]. Inhibition of selectin function by a recombinant human PSGL-1-IgG fusion protein (YSPSL) did not reduce the reperfusion-induced damage in patients with kidney transplantation and myocardial infraction [125,126], while YSPSL improved early liver allograft function after liver transplantation [127].…”
Section: Antiselectin Therapeutic Aproachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blocking the activity of selectins in several clinical disorders failed to be effective as antiinflammatory drug [10,100]. In a randomized placebocontrolled trial, the clinical efficacy and side effects of the humanized anti E-selectin antibody CDP850 in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were investigated [101].…”
Section: Clinical Trials Of Autoimmune Diseases Using Anti-adhesive Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the treatment had no therapeutic effect, because psoriasis area and severity were unaffected. In a phase II trial with multiple traumatized patients, the anti-Lselectin antibody aselizumab was administered within 6 hours of the traumatic event [100]. The therapy presented no significant efficacy compared with placebo.…”
Section: Clinical Trials Of Autoimmune Diseases Using Anti-adhesive Smentioning
confidence: 99%