2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9230-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Arizona language policies on Arizona Indigenous students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in common with many other Anglophone countries, high-stakes educational testing in literacy and numeracy has been introduced, partly justified as a means to reduce Indigenous disadvantage by ensuring competency in English (Allendorf 2017;Macqueen et al 2018;McCarty 2009;Ryan and Whitman 2013;Wyman et al 2010). In Australia, USA, and Canada, where rates of Indigenous language loss have been the most dramatic, the results of nationwide tests for educational attainment, conducted in English, have been used to reduce support for bilingual education (Combs and Nicholas 2012;Devlin 2011;Wyman et al 2010). But development of these policies focused on English competency has seen less emphasis on the effect of formal education on competency in Indigenous languages, nor on appropriate ways to evaluate such an effect (Hinton 2011;Macqueen et al 2018;O'Grady 2018), leading to the 'squandering of the personal, community, and national linguistic and intellectual resources within the mainstream classroom' (Cummins 2005).…”
Section: The Effects Of Education In English and Exposure To Gurindjimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in common with many other Anglophone countries, high-stakes educational testing in literacy and numeracy has been introduced, partly justified as a means to reduce Indigenous disadvantage by ensuring competency in English (Allendorf 2017;Macqueen et al 2018;McCarty 2009;Ryan and Whitman 2013;Wyman et al 2010). In Australia, USA, and Canada, where rates of Indigenous language loss have been the most dramatic, the results of nationwide tests for educational attainment, conducted in English, have been used to reduce support for bilingual education (Combs and Nicholas 2012;Devlin 2011;Wyman et al 2010). But development of these policies focused on English competency has seen less emphasis on the effect of formal education on competency in Indigenous languages, nor on appropriate ways to evaluate such an effect (Hinton 2011;Macqueen et al 2018;O'Grady 2018), leading to the 'squandering of the personal, community, and national linguistic and intellectual resources within the mainstream classroom' (Cummins 2005).…”
Section: The Effects Of Education In English and Exposure To Gurindjimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15-752). As Combs and Nicholas (2012) write, with the advent of these state laws “enrollment in Indigenous language programs became, if not illegal, certainly more complicated” (p. 103).…”
Section: Looking Back and Moving Forward: Lessons From A Generation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English‐only policies have drastic consequences for many multilingual students in the United States: retention, intervention programs, segregated learning environments, and special education services (Combs & Nicholas, ; DaSilva Iddings et al., ; Souto‐Manning, ). This litany of subtractive schooling practices (Valenzuela, ) limits access to inquiry opportunities, flexible curricula, opportunities for play, and full inclusion in classrooms.…”
Section: Language Policy and Issues Of Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%