2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2008.4649751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of artifact correction on spectral estimates of heart rate variability

Abstract: Abstract-Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability might offer additional information that can be used for assessing the fetal condition more reliably. Clinical recordings of fetal heart rate are usually contaminated by artifacts. These artifacts can be detected and corrected or removed, but this can affect the spectral estimates obtained from the heart rate data. To determine what level of artifact correction is still acceptable for reliable calculation of spectral heart rate variability parameters, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sudden transitions introduced by deletions will falsely increase all three measures. As shown here, long-term time domain HRV measures are more tolerant to artifact than short-term measures, which is consistent with the literature (e.g., Peters, Vullings, Bergmans, Oei, & Wijn, 2008;Salo et al, 2001).…”
Section: Deletion Of Rr Intervals As Well As Insertion Of Artifact Isupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sudden transitions introduced by deletions will falsely increase all three measures. As shown here, long-term time domain HRV measures are more tolerant to artifact than short-term measures, which is consistent with the literature (e.g., Peters, Vullings, Bergmans, Oei, & Wijn, 2008;Salo et al, 2001).…”
Section: Deletion Of Rr Intervals As Well As Insertion Of Artifact Isupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Spectral analysis has been widely used to measure FHR and FHRV, but can be vulnerable to missing data (Peters, Vullings, Bergmans, Oei, & Wijn, 2008). We were unable to conduct a spectral analysis because 36% of our data was missing.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum length of FHR signal that is required to calculate LF (and T P) is determined by the largest wavelet of the LF band. Therefore, a segment of at least 50 seconds is required to reliably calculate LF (Peters et al, 2008). Similarly, calculation of normalized frequency powers (LF n and HF n ) also requires 50 seconds.…”
Section: Frequency Domain Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%