2019
DOI: 10.1177/1933719118799192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Assisted Hatching on Live Birth Rate Following Fresh Embryo Transfer in Advanced Maternal Age

Abstract: Assisted hatching does not improve the reproductive outcomes in advanced maternal age. Performing routine AH for the sole indication of advanced maternal age is not clinically justified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature defined advanced maternal age often as maternal age ≥ 35 years because of increased many pregnancy complications. Low parity is defined as parity 1 -4 (the delivery of the second to the fourth baby) (11). In the present study, we used parity 1, as a reference category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature defined advanced maternal age often as maternal age ≥ 35 years because of increased many pregnancy complications. Low parity is defined as parity 1 -4 (the delivery of the second to the fourth baby) (11). In the present study, we used parity 1, as a reference category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,29 Although AH can improve clinical pregnancy rates, some reports have revealed that AH does not significantly increase birth rate. 3,15,19,45 Miyata et al demonstrated that AH of thawed human blastocysts near the ICM resulted in a significantly higher rate of complete hatching, 11 while Ren et al reported that the site of AH did not influence implantation, pregnancy, or live birth rate during human vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. 46 However, we convincingly demonstrated that AAH treatment in mice at the B-site of expanding blastocysts, which mimics natural hatching in vitro, dramatically improved birth rate (77.1%) compared with AAH at the C-site (55.3%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of AH was initially developed to achieve artificial manipulation of the ZP, mediate embryo hatching, and improve the rate of embryo implantation, 18,29 although the full extent of AH’s beneficial effects in human embryos related to pregnancy and birth outcomes is scarce in published literature 18,29 . Although AH can improve clinical pregnancy rates, some reports have revealed that AH does not significantly increase birth rate 3,15,19,45 . Miyata et al demonstrated that AH of thawed human blastocysts near the ICM resulted in a significantly higher rate of complete hatching, 11 while Ren et al reported that the site of AH did not influence implantation, pregnancy, or live birth rate during human vitrified‐warmed blastocyst transfer cycles 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence that embryo stage may influence the outcomes of AH. Tannus et al demonstrated in a retrospective study on fresh embryo transfers in women aged 40 and above that AH was associated with reduced live birth rate with cleavage stage embryos but not with blastocysts [34]. In addition, with current methods of vitrification, thawed blastocysts may not benefit from AH as much as they did with past freeze-thaw techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%