1990
DOI: 10.1093/jmt/27.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Auditory Distraction and Suggestion on Tolerance for Dental Restorations in Adolescents and Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1981;Standley 1991), potilaan kokemaan kivun määrään (mm. Gfeller, Logan & Walker 1990;Baghdadi 2000;Aitken ym. 2002), ahdistukseen hoitotilanteessa (mm.…”
Section: Musiikki Hammashoidossaunclassified
“…1981;Standley 1991), potilaan kokemaan kivun määrään (mm. Gfeller, Logan & Walker 1990;Baghdadi 2000;Aitken ym. 2002), ahdistukseen hoitotilanteessa (mm.…”
Section: Musiikki Hammashoidossaunclassified
“…In Gfeller 14 , too, as a result of a survey of the level of anxiety with dental patients, it was reported that there was no difference in the score for state anxiety between a control group and an experimental group. Previous studies interpreted that it would be difficult for one-time music appreciation to control anxiety in dental treatment, but continuous music appreciation could result in a different effect.…”
Section: Effect Of Music Appreciation During Dental Treatment On Dentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lai et al 14 focus on the effect of music on patients during root canal operations, and Kim et al 15 report on the beneficial effect of music on patients during surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. Gfeller and colleagues 16 report on musical distraction during dental procedures among both adults and adolescents. Corah et al 17 contains earlier research on this topic.…”
Section: Impact Of An Interdisciplinary Concert Series On Stress and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first bar for each question is the overall mean (n ¼ 159-185). Bars 2 to 5 for each question are for the students (n ¼ 118-124), faculty (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), other status (n ¼ 11-24), and unknown status (n ¼ [16][17][18]. Except for students, sample sizes are rather small by group.…”
Section: Numerical Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%