2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of bank ownership and deposit insurance on monetary policy transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next to the fact that insured deposits constitute the bulk of total deposits, insured deposit holders may display different behaviour than uninsured deposit holders with respect to monetary shocks (Demirgüç‐Kunt & Kane, ; Karas, Pyle, & Schoors, ). Andries and Billon (), for instance, theoretically show that deposits under insurance exhibit a more stable pattern in response to a monetary shock. In the case of increasing bank risk and corresponding monetary policy interventions, for instance, uninsured deposit holders’ response to monetary shocks is augmented with the risk of bank failure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to the fact that insured deposits constitute the bulk of total deposits, insured deposit holders may display different behaviour than uninsured deposit holders with respect to monetary shocks (Demirgüç‐Kunt & Kane, ; Karas, Pyle, & Schoors, ). Andries and Billon (), for instance, theoretically show that deposits under insurance exhibit a more stable pattern in response to a monetary shock. In the case of increasing bank risk and corresponding monetary policy interventions, for instance, uninsured deposit holders’ response to monetary shocks is augmented with the risk of bank failure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is vital for the central bank to understand how different types of risks could emanate in different types of banks, in response to monetary policy actions. While the literature has studied how differences in ownership structures of banks affect the lending channel of monetary policy transmission (Andries & Billon, 2010; Bhaumik, Dang, & Kutan, 2011), the effect of ownership on the risk-taking channel is less explored. The role of ownership is particularly important for emerging economies that have banking systems characterised by mixed ownership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that government-owned banks are able to raise loan supply during periods of tighter monetary policy. Andries and Billon (2010) and Brei and Schclarek (2015) postulated that government-owned banks are able to source additional funds during periods of monetary policy tightening, and as a result, they are not required to reduce their lending activities. This happens because government-owned banks can obtain stable deposits due to better deposit guarantee (Micco & Panizza, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%