2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03760-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of bicipital groove morphology on the stability of the biceps long head tendon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphologies of the biceps groove reported by different studies are quite different. Taking the depth of the biceps groove as an example, the average values of the biceps groove varied from 4.2 to 5.8 mm in different studies [5,6,14,15] , while the value in this study was 4.88 mm. This variation could come from demographic variations in the subjects, such as race, ethnicity, and other factors, or from variations in the measurement method adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The morphologies of the biceps groove reported by different studies are quite different. Taking the depth of the biceps groove as an example, the average values of the biceps groove varied from 4.2 to 5.8 mm in different studies [5,6,14,15] , while the value in this study was 4.88 mm. This variation could come from demographic variations in the subjects, such as race, ethnicity, and other factors, or from variations in the measurement method adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Urita et al [15] used CT data to show that there was no signi cant correlation between the morphological parameters and LHBT lesions except for the bony spur in the medial wall of the biceps groove and the injury of the subscapularis tendon. Uluckoy et al [5] also found that, except for subscapular tendinopathy, the shape of biceps sulci had little relationship with LHBT stability. Our study also found no correlation between the morphology of the biceps groove and LHBT injury, suggesting that the osseous structure is not the only and decisive stabilizing factor of LHBT lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretically, the osseous dimensions of the bicipital groove contributes to the stability of the LHBT; several studies based on MRI suggest the presence of a spur on the bicipital groove [11], a larger opening angle, a smaller medial angle and a shallower depth are predisposing factors for biceps tendon instability [12]. With ultrasound, however, these dimensions or the cross-sectional area are not related to the stability or other pathologies of the LHBT [13,14]. The bony morphology of the bicipital groove demonstrated by US has a limited value in the diagnosis of various pathologies related to the LHBT.…”
Section: Bicipital Groove Morphology and Cross-sectional Areamentioning
confidence: 99%