2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14051190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Binder Loading on the Pore Size of 3D Printed PMMA

Abstract: Binder jetting is known to produce porous objects by depositing the binder selectively layer by layer on a powder bed. In this study, the pore size of printed parts and the correlating mechanical properties are investigated on a commercially available PMMA powder binder system. Pore sizes are measured via capillary flow porometry and mechanical properties via tensile tests. Porometry indicates that the pore size stays at a constant level of 22 µm at 5 to 10 wt% binder loading before decreasing to 6 µm at loadi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our printed foams were compared with the literature reports for foams that were 3D printed by various technologies (Fig. 5(C)) 15,16,[21][22][23][24]26,27,[30][31][32]39,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53] to construct the plot, we searched publications under the keywords ''3D printing'', ''foams'' or/and ''porous'', and evaluated only the papers that contained tensile measurements. It should be noted that most publications on photopolymerization-based printing of foams/ porous materials result in stiff polymers 37,54 or ceramics [55][56][57] that cannot elongate and therefore tensile measurements were not reported for.…”
Section: State Of the Art And Soft Robot Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our printed foams were compared with the literature reports for foams that were 3D printed by various technologies (Fig. 5(C)) 15,16,[21][22][23][24]26,27,[30][31][32]39,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53] to construct the plot, we searched publications under the keywords ''3D printing'', ''foams'' or/and ''porous'', and evaluated only the papers that contained tensile measurements. It should be noted that most publications on photopolymerization-based printing of foams/ porous materials result in stiff polymers 37,54 or ceramics [55][56][57] that cannot elongate and therefore tensile measurements were not reported for.…”
Section: State Of the Art And Soft Robot Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common porous materials that can be 3D printed are ceramics, metals, and polymer-ceramic composites, which are unsuitable for soft robotics due to their rigid nature. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] On the other hand, polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), PDMS, polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) can become porous by conventional processes after printing, using foaming agents or sacrificial powders. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] However, these porous polymers are typically 3D printed using extrusion-based methods, which limits their structural complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%