2023
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13102516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Bioclimatic Covariates on Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction of Total Soil Carbon in the Pannonian Biogeoregion

Dorijan Radočaj,
Mladen Jurišić,
Vjekoslav Tadić

Abstract: This study employed an ensemble machine learning approach to evaluate the effect of bioclimatic covariates on the prediction accuracy of soil total carbon (TC) in the Pannonian biogeoregion. The analysis involved two main segments: (1) evaluation of base environmental covariates, including surface reflectance, phenology, and derived covariates, compared to the addition of bioclimatic covariates; and (2) assessment of three individual machine learning methods, including random forest (RF), extreme gradient boos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while several broader studies generally agreed on the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning, they also provided mixed observations regarding its robustness relative to individual methods. These studies noted the dependence of their prediction accuracy on the characteristics of the input samples [25,47] and the prediction principles used by the individual methods in the ensemble [26]. XGB was shown to be a superior prediction method to RF and SVM, demonstrating robustness and resistance to overfitting as shown by the comprehensive leave-one-out cross-validation approach [48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while several broader studies generally agreed on the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning, they also provided mixed observations regarding its robustness relative to individual methods. These studies noted the dependence of their prediction accuracy on the characteristics of the input samples [25,47] and the prediction principles used by the individual methods in the ensemble [26]. XGB was shown to be a superior prediction method to RF and SVM, demonstrating robustness and resistance to overfitting as shown by the comprehensive leave-one-out cross-validation approach [48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two machine learning methods, Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were evaluated alongside DNN. RF and XGB achieved superior prediction accuracy in regression problems compared to current machine learning algorithms in similar studies on various aspects of horticulture [58,59] and agriculture in general [60][61][62]. As an ensemble learning technique, RF builds a forest of decision trees, each trained separately on randomly selected samples of the data and features [63].…”
Section: Deep and Machine Learning Prediction And Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%