2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02576.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Bipole Tip-to-Ring Distance in Atrial Electrodes upon Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Sensing Capability in Modern Dual-Chamber Pacemakers

Abstract: Atrial electrodes with a short TTR (<10 mm) significantly reduce FFRWO without increasing undersensing and should be used routinely in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, 20% of atrial tachyarrythmia episodes were incorrectly classified as terminated by these modern devices due to undersensing. Clinicians should be wary of using device-derived endpoints that rely on AF episode number or duration as these may be falsely increased or reduced, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23, 24 The capture and sensing thresholds of these leads were similar and remained stable in the long term. [23][24][25] In our study, the prevalence of sensed FFRW in the LAS region at an atrial sensitivity ≥0.3 mV was significantly higher when the ring-tip electrodes spacing was 10.0 mm than when it was 1.1 mm, while the pacing and sensing thresholds were similar. Thus, a shorter interelectrode spacing of the atrial lead lowered the likelihood of sensed FFRW, without interfering with pacing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23, 24 The capture and sensing thresholds of these leads were similar and remained stable in the long term. [23][24][25] In our study, the prevalence of sensed FFRW in the LAS region at an atrial sensitivity ≥0.3 mV was significantly higher when the ring-tip electrodes spacing was 10.0 mm than when it was 1.1 mm, while the pacing and sensing thresholds were similar. Thus, a shorter interelectrode spacing of the atrial lead lowered the likelihood of sensed FFRW, without interfering with pacing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…18 Effects of the Spacing of the Tip-Ring Electrode of the Bipolar Atrial Lead on FFRW Sensing in the LAS The interelectrode spacing of bipolar atrial leads determines, in part, the likelihood of FFRW sensing, 8,23-25 which tends to decrease as the spacing narrows. [23][24][25] In the RAA, at a sensitivity of 0.3 mV, FFRW were sensed in 30% of recipients of leads with 10-mm interelectrode spacing, and in none of the patients who received leads with ring-tip electrodes separated by 1.1 mm. 23, 24 The capture and sensing thresholds of these leads were similar and remained stable in the long term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of AHRE detection depends on adequate sensing and discrimination of atrial potentials. [1][2][3] Intermittent undersensing of continuous AF and undersensing of very short episodes of AF or other ATAs are often observed and may cause inappropriate AHRE detection. [1,3,4] And conversely, oversensing of far-field R-wave (FFRW) [5] or sensing of retrograde atrial depolarizations [4,6,7] may erroneously trigger AHRE detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that reducing the inter-electrode tip-to-ring spacing of atrial bipolar leads reduces the amplitude of far-field R-wave and consequently the occurrence of inappropriate mode switches [16], [17]. With the availability of new leads providing a very short tip-to-ring distance of 1.1 mm instead of traditional 10 mm spacing, FFS may be further reduced [18][20] and individual adjustment of pacemaker settings may no longer necessary to avoid FFS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%