2023
DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00203-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of body mass index and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity on postoperative outcomes to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Natalie Pavlovic,
Ian A. Harris,
Robert Boland
et al.

Abstract: Background Few studies have investigated the association between obesity, preoperative weight loss and postoperative outcomes beyond 30- and 90-days post-arthroplasty. This study investigated whether body mass index (BMI) and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity predict postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes 6 months following total knee or hip arthroplasty. Methods Two independent, prospectively collected datasets of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sled et al [10] proposed a landmark-based method for assessing Hip knee ankle angle (HKA) using customized software, addressing common issues in similar methods. In clinical practice, measurement accuracy can be influenced by factors such as body position [11][12][13] (like loading, flexion, or rotation of lower limbs), image quality [7], and reader experience [14][15][16]. Even with software assistance, deviations caused by hardware facilities and use can also affect the measurement, which leads to inter-and intra-reader variability and unsatisfied reliability [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sled et al [10] proposed a landmark-based method for assessing Hip knee ankle angle (HKA) using customized software, addressing common issues in similar methods. In clinical practice, measurement accuracy can be influenced by factors such as body position [11][12][13] (like loading, flexion, or rotation of lower limbs), image quality [7], and reader experience [14][15][16]. Even with software assistance, deviations caused by hardware facilities and use can also affect the measurement, which leads to inter-and intra-reader variability and unsatisfied reliability [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%