1986
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7992(86)90076-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of caffeine in the in vivo SCE and micronucleus mutagenicity tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, no study has thoroughly examined differences in the spontaneous frequencies among the many mouse stocks used with the assay. Several studies have attempted to compare the relative sensitivity of mouse stocks to clastogens [Aeschbacher et al, 1979;Aeschbacher 1986;Hayashi et al, 1982;Styles et al, 1983;Sat0 et al, 1987Sat0 et al, , 1990Sat0 et al, , 1993 The Collaborative Study Group (CSGMT), 19881. The problem with the approach used in these studies is that it is difficult to put together a study that incorporates enough different mouse stocks and participating test facilities, along with a sufficient number and variety of chemicals, to come to a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no study has thoroughly examined differences in the spontaneous frequencies among the many mouse stocks used with the assay. Several studies have attempted to compare the relative sensitivity of mouse stocks to clastogens [Aeschbacher et al, 1979;Aeschbacher 1986;Hayashi et al, 1982;Styles et al, 1983;Sat0 et al, 1987Sat0 et al, , 1990Sat0 et al, , 1993 The Collaborative Study Group (CSGMT), 19881. The problem with the approach used in these studies is that it is difficult to put together a study that incorporates enough different mouse stocks and participating test facilities, along with a sufficient number and variety of chemicals, to come to a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although earlier studies of caffeine effects in animals and man have failed to demonstrate significant genotoxic effects in vivo at doses near those that would result from the consumption of caffeinated beverages (30-33), the recent report by Chen et al (34) that chromosomal fragility in human lymphocytes cultured under low-folate conditions is linearly related to the level of coffee consumption of the donor supports the possibility that caffeine could exert significant effects in man under low-folate conditions. Previous studies of caffeine have shown little or no effect on micronucleus frequencies in mouse bone marrow at doses up to 200 mg/kg (31)(32)(33). However, these studies were carried out in mice maintained on commercial laboratory feeds, which contained adequate folate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a large number of in vivo genotoxicity tests (micronuclei, SCE's, chromosome aberrations aneuploidy, dominant lethal), both at somatic and germ cell levels, caffeine gave negative results, although few positive results were observed in some studies (see also references in D'Ambrosio (), IARC (), OECD () and by FDA ()). Significant induction of SCE's, chromosome aberrations and micronuclei were observed following in vivo treatment of Chinese hamsters and mice (Basler et al., ; Aeschbacher et al., ; Haynes et al., ; Choudhury and Palo, ). However, these increases were observed only at the highest dose levels and were generally small in quantitative terms.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%