The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on a 30-minute arm cranking performance

Andersson, Helén; Sinclair, Jonathan Kenneth; Knight, Alfred B.; Buscombe, Richard; Edmonds, C. J.; Bottoms, Lindsay

doi:10.3920/cep150032

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 42 publications

(62 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, according to the adjusted, conservative, meta-regression model using robust variance estimation, there was no indication that the moderator of sex contributes to an improvement in exercise performance with carbohydrate oral rinsing. While the majority of studies in this area recruit male participants, they are often classified as physically active or participate in moderate to high levels of activity [ 2 , 29 , 30 , 39 , 40 , 43 ]. Additional research has recruited participants that either train competitively or are experienced in that particular mode of exercise (i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Functional activities and training are more representative of daily movement and general exercise movement patterns [ 104 ]. One previous study used an arm cranking protocol [ 39 ]. However, this study did not find significant differences in distance (km) covered during a 30-min trial with a maltodextrin rinse when compared with a placebo.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, improvements in exercise performance after an oral carbohydrate rinse in comparison with a placebo rinse have been found with cycling [29][30][31][32][33], running [34][35][36][37] and resistance exercise [38]. In contrast, some studies have reported no significant improvements in exercise performance [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. This lack of significant improvements may be due to the study design (i.e.…”

Section: Key Pointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Maltodextrin-Based Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing and Exercise Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Carbohydrates are an important fuel for optimal exercise performance during moderate- and high-intensity exercise; however, carbohydrate ingestion during high-intensity exercise may cause gastrointestinal upset. A carbohydrate oral rinse is an alternative method to improve exercise performance in moderate- to high-intensity exercise with a duration of 30–75 min. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively examine the isolated effect of maltodextrin-based rinsing on exercise performance. Objective The objective of this review was to establish the effect of a maltodextrin-based carbohydrate oral rinse on exercise performance across various modes of exercise. Furthermore, a secondary objective was to determine the effects of moderators [(1) participant characteristics; (2) oral rinse protocols; (3) exercise protocol (i.e. cycling, running etc.) and (4) fasting] on exercise performance while using a maltodextrin-based, carbohydrate oral rinse. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, SPORTDiscus and Global Health) were systematically searched for articles up to March 2021 and screened using Covidence (a systematic review management tool). A random effects robust meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. Results Thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review; 34 of these articles were included in the meta-analysis. When using a conventional meta-analytic approach, overall, a carbohydrate oral rinse improved exercise performance in comparison with a placebo (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.04, 0.27; p = 0.01). Furthermore, when implementing an adjusted, conservative, random effects meta-regression model using robust variance estimation, overall, compared with placebo, a carbohydrate oral rinse demonstrated evidence of improving exercise performance with a small effect size (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI − 0.01, 0.34; p = 0.051). Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that a maltodextrin-based carbohydrate oral rinse can improve exercise performance. When comparing the two meta-analytic approaches, although non-significant, the more robust, adjusted, random effects meta-regression model demonstrated some evidence of a maltodextrin-based carbohydrate oral rinse improving exercise performance overall.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Key Pointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maltodextrin-Based Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing and Exercise Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The type of carbohydrate used for rinsing is another factor that may influence the efficacy of a carbohydrate oral rinse for improving performance. Oral rinses used to investigate the effect on exercise performance are often composed of maltodextrin [15,16,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], glucose [16,17,36,38,40,49], sucrose [50] and sucralose [51]. While these oral rinses have been utilised in previous research, the effect of a sucralose oral rinse has not been compared with a maltodextrin-based oral rinse and the effect of an oligofructose oral rinse on exercise performance has not been investigated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing, Cycling Performance and Individual Complex Carbohydrate Taste Sensitivity

Hartley,

Carr,

Roberts

et al. 2024

Nutrients

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this pilot study was to determine the effect of individual complex carbohydrate taste sensitivity on cycling performance with complex carbohydrate oral rinsing. Ten male participants completed five cycling time trials in a fasted state with a seven-day washout period between each trial. Participants completed a fixed amount of work (738.45 ± 150.74 kJ) as fast as possible on a cycle ergometer while rinsing with an oral rinse for 10 s every 12.5% of the trial. An oral rinse (maltodextrin, oligofructose, glucose, sucralose or water control) was given per visit in a randomised, crossover, blinded design. Afterwards, participants had their taste assessed with three stimuli, complex carbohydrate (maltodextrin), sweet (glucose) and sour (citric acid), using taste assessment protocol to determine individual taste sensitivity status. Participants were subsequently grouped according to their complex carbohydrate taste sensitivity and complex carbohydrate taste intensity. There were no significant effects of the oral rinses on cycling performance time (p = 0.173). Participants who did not have improvements in exercise performance with the maltodextrin rinse experienced a stronger taste intensity with complex carbohydrate stimuli at baseline (p = 0.047) and overall (p = 0.047) than those who did have improvements in performance. Overall, a carbohydrate oral rinse was ineffective in significantly improving cycling performance in comparison with a water control. However, when participants were grouped according to complex carbohydrate taste intensity, differences in exercise performance suggest that individual sensitivity status to complex carbohydrates could impact the efficacy of a carbohydrate-based oral rinse.

show abstract

The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on a 30-minute arm cranking performance

Cited by 2 publications

References 42 publications

Maltodextrin-Based Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing and Exercise Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maltodextrin-Based Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing and Exercise Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing, Cycling Performance and Individual Complex Carbohydrate Taste Sensitivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About