2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Ce4+ incorporation on structural, morphological and photocatalytic characters of ZnO nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG‐Dy 2 O 3 NPs showed a few new peaks at 2θ of 21.1, 24.7 and 35.6°, which are mainly attributed to the mixture of Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 and Dy 2 O 3 (Joya et al 2013; Zelati et al 2013; Özgür et al 2018). Based on the diffraction peaks at 24.7 and 35.6°, the crystallite size (D) of Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG and Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG‐Dy 2 O 3 NPs was estimated using the well‐known Scherrer formula, D = K·λ/β cos θ (where K is the Scherrer constant, λ, the X‐ray wavelength, β, the peak width of half maximum, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle) (Kannadasan et al 2014). The crystallite sizes of Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG NPs and Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG‐Dy 2 O 3 NPs were estimated to be 12.27 and 11.98 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG‐Dy 2 O 3 NPs showed a few new peaks at 2θ of 21.1, 24.7 and 35.6°, which are mainly attributed to the mixture of Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 and Dy 2 O 3 (Joya et al 2013; Zelati et al 2013; Özgür et al 2018). Based on the diffraction peaks at 24.7 and 35.6°, the crystallite size (D) of Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG and Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG‐Dy 2 O 3 NPs was estimated using the well‐known Scherrer formula, D = K·λ/β cos θ (where K is the Scherrer constant, λ, the X‐ray wavelength, β, the peak width of half maximum, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle) (Kannadasan et al 2014). The crystallite sizes of Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG NPs and Fe 3 O 4 ‐PEG‐Dy 2 O 3 NPs were estimated to be 12.27 and 11.98 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the energy of electrons excited to the conduction band of ZnO was transferred not to the defect-related deep levels but to the Eu 3+ ion activators to induce more photon energy absorption [32]. Further, the energy of the excited electrons in the conduction band of the ZnO is transferred to the newly created Eu 3+ ions and leads to 5d→4f transition which may account for intense visible emissions [33,34]. This is very important because it makes the Eu-doped ZnO NW array suitable as an active layer or wavelength conversion layer in optoelectronic devices, such as dye-sensitized solar cells or white light-emitting diodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak at 531.76 ev belongs to O=C-O binding (40) in Fig. 1b and the peak at 530.8 ev belongs to Zn-O binding (41) in Fig. 1c.…”
Section: Surface and Interface Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%