1973
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.57.3.837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Cell-to-Cell Contact on the Surface Morphology of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells

Abstract: In the previous report (Porter et al ., in this issue) morphological changes in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during the cell cycle were described . In this report we describe the role of intercellular contact on these changes . We find that intercellular contact is required for cells to exhibit the morphologies Porter et al . described for S and G2 . When cells are synchronized by mitotic selection and plated onto cover slips at very low density such that no intercellular contact occurs, the cells remain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, CHO cells in confluency, observed during the cell cycle, go through a series of morphological changes which includes during S and G2 a relatively well-spread lamellar form (13) . The same cells maintained in a very sparse culture where little or no contact is achieved retain during most of the cycle a humped-up form more characteristic of GI (19) . Thus it appears that cell form is one expression of contact inhibition of growth and movement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CHO cells in confluency, observed during the cell cycle, go through a series of morphological changes which includes during S and G2 a relatively well-spread lamellar form (13) . The same cells maintained in a very sparse culture where little or no contact is achieved retain during most of the cycle a humped-up form more characteristic of GI (19) . Thus it appears that cell form is one expression of contact inhibition of growth and movement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning electronmicroscopy studies' indicate that RBL-1 cells have approximately the same number of folds and microvilli on cells derived from a stationary culture (more than 80% G, cells) and on cells derived from a culture in which more than 50% of the cells were in the S phase . Thus, unlike CHO cells, shown to have more peripheral processes in the G, phase and less in the S phase (35,36), RBL-1 cells seem to have the same surface morphology in S and G, phase and therefore a relatively constant, albeit nonlinear, relationship between volume and surface area . Consequently, our data suggest a higher density of receptors per unit area in the stationary cells .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When studying dividing cells it is sometimes difficult to differentiate mycoplasma from the blebs and other structures that appear on cell surfaces in anaphase and telophase (and possibly at other stages of the cell cycle) (20,23). Under these conditions, morphology alone may not be sufficient for the definitive identification of mycoplasma, and we therefore used the techniques described below to identify the organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%