2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of centralization on short term outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy in a universal health care system

Abstract: Background: Centralization of pancreatic resections is advocated due to a volume-outcome association. Pancreatic surgery is in Norway currently performed only in five teaching hospitals. The aim was to describe the short-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) within the current organizational model and to assess for regional disparities.Methods: All patients who underwent PD in Norway between 2012 and 2016 were identified. Mortality (90 days) and relaparotomy (30 days) were assessed for predictors incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the findings reported herein are associations and not causations e they are hypothesis-generating data that warrant research effort into a better understanding of the reported variation across the four regions in Norway. As a similar variation was not noted for the same regions and hospitals for pancreatoduodenectomies [8], we assume that the variation lies in the practice of distal pancreatectomy and likely as an effect of minimal invasive access that may influence choice to operate over observation for some indications. This should be kept in mind when comparing results and outcomes from single-center studies.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the findings reported herein are associations and not causations e they are hypothesis-generating data that warrant research effort into a better understanding of the reported variation across the four regions in Norway. As a similar variation was not noted for the same regions and hospitals for pancreatoduodenectomies [8], we assume that the variation lies in the practice of distal pancreatectomy and likely as an effect of minimal invasive access that may influence choice to operate over observation for some indications. This should be kept in mind when comparing results and outcomes from single-center studies.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…We have previously shown that use of distal pancreatectomy is increasing overall in Norway, and this is related to a significant increase in laparoscopic procedures [7]. One should keep in mind that while resection rates in Norway (during the same time period) also increased for pancreatoduodenectomies, the difference in population-adjusted resection rates between regions was negligible for this procedure [8]. Thus, rates of pancreatoduodenectomies stand in contrast to the current findings that demonstrate a 176% relative difference in the populationadjusted resection rate between the region with the lowest and the highest rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations