The effect of cereal break crops on barley mild mosaic virus

Adams, Michael J.; Jones, Dennis; O'Neill, T. M.; Hill, S. A.

doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1993.tb04070.x

Cited by 21 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The schematic genome organization of bymoviruses, exemplified for BaMMV, is presented in Fig. The fungal vector provides protection against unfavorable environmental conditions and during long rotations of non-host crops and allows the viruses to persist almost indefinitely once a field has become infested (Adams et al 1993;Kanyuka et al 2003). Under natural conditions BaYMV and BaMMV are transmitted by the rootinhabiting fungal-like plasmodiophorid Polymyxa graminis (Adams et al 1988).…”

Section: Barley Yellow Mosaic Virus and Barley Mild Mosaic Virusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biotechnological Approaches to Barley Improvement

Kumlehn

Stein

2014

Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher's location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) PrefaceBarley is deemed one of the first plant species to be domesticated. Its cultivation over a very broad range of environments and its versatile utilization for the production of raw material for feed and food render it a top-four crop plant worldwide. Representing the temperate cereals of the Triticeae tribe (wheat, rye, triticale), barley has been used as experimental model since the era of classical genetics and cytogenetics-a role that has been reinforced along the development of contemporary biology and crop plant research.The generation of comprehensive genome sequence data is regarded as a cornerstone with major impact into all areas of modern barley research. Thus, we are convinced of the timeliness and importance to survey and reflect the current state of biotechnologically oriented barley research in the present volume of the Springer series Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Besides genome sequencing, major progress was achieved by deep sequencing-based transcriptomics, the establishment of comprehensive mutant panels and TILLING platforms, the generation of high-resolution genetic maps, efficient site-directed mutagenesis using customizable endonucleases, as well as the establishment of automa...

show abstract

Section: Barley Yellow Mosaic Virus and Barley Mild Mosaic Virusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biotechnological Approaches to Barley Improvement

Kumlehn

Stein

2014

Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Perhaps, larger differences in Pf after R and S cultivars could be measured when the level of resistance in R plants is increased and when they are grown for more than one year at the same site. However, recent data from Adams et al [1993] showed that growing a resistant barley cultivar or a non-host crop (wheat) for 3 years did not significantly reduce soil populations of barley mild mosaic virus, although a trend was apparent.…”

Section: Density and Total Number Of Resting Spore Clusters In Bnyvv-mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of sugar beet cultivars with different levels of resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus on transmission of virus byPolymyxa betae

Tuitert¹,

Oorschot²,

Heijbroek³

1994

Eur J Plant Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of resistance of sugar beet cultivars to beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) on virus content of resting spore clusters of the vector Polymyxa betae was studied in controlled environments and in naturally infested fields. The total number of resting spore clusters formed in roots of a partially resistant and a susceptible cultivar did not differ when assessed 6 and 12 weeks after inoculation with viruliferous resting spores. Transmission experiments showed that in partially resistant plants, having a low virus content in the roots, the population of resting spores formed was less viruliferous than that in susceptible plants with a high virus content. Consequently, growing a resistant cultivar can be expected to delay the build-up of virus inoculum in soil.In a trial field sampled in 1991, the inoculum potential of BNYVV (most probable number of viruliferous P. betae propagules) in soil was lower after growing a partially resistant cultivar than after growing a susceptible one. On the other hand, in four sites sampled in 1990, inoculum potential in soil was hardly increased by growing sugar beet and was not significantly affected by the cultivar grown.

show abstract

“…P. graminis resting spores are able to persist in the soil for more than 10 years while remaining viruliferous (Usugi 1988). Consequently, crop rotation is not a satisfactory means to limiting the diseases, nor is chemical control, which is inefficient, expensive and ecologically damaging (Kusuba et al 1971;Adams et al 1993). Therefore, control of soilborne mosaic diseases is primarily based on the use of resistant varieties (Kanyuka et al 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%