2004
DOI: 10.2136/sh2004.3.0096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Changes in Bulk Density on Soil Electrical Conductivity as Measured with the Geonics EM-38

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Averaged values for clay and stone content were 18 and 7%, with a standard deviation of 2.5 and 6%, respectively. The average ρ b value was 1.76 Mg m -3 , and standard deviation for the field was 0.10 Mg m -3 ; ρ b variations of this level are unlikely to significantly influence the ECa readings (Brevik and Fenton, 2004). Stone content showed great spatial variability across the catchment, with higher stone contents occurring mainly on the south facing slopes, in the northern part of the catchment (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Averaged values for clay and stone content were 18 and 7%, with a standard deviation of 2.5 and 6%, respectively. The average ρ b value was 1.76 Mg m -3 , and standard deviation for the field was 0.10 Mg m -3 ; ρ b variations of this level are unlikely to significantly influence the ECa readings (Brevik and Fenton, 2004). Stone content showed great spatial variability across the catchment, with higher stone contents occurring mainly on the south facing slopes, in the northern part of the catchment (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this respect, the initial EC of rain water and its residence time in the soil may play a key role along with the mineralogical composition of the soil. Soil compaction affects EC due to the reduced porosity and increased soil particle-to-particle contact (Corwin et al, 2008;Brevik and Fenton, 2004). Soil temperature also affects EC, which increases approximately 1.9 % per degree centigrade (U.S.D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bronson et al [16] concluded that ECa can be used as potential tool to provide information about soil properties such as clay content and extractable Ca in the U.S. Southern High Plains, but that spatial covariance needs to be considered as it can improve estimation of ECa. Changes in bulk density resulting from management practices within or between fields on the order of 0.12 to 0.13 g·cm −3 lead to changes in soil ECa affecting soil interpretations made in the field using the EM-38 [17]. Previous studies on ECa relationship with soil properties and crop yields either on small field scale or watershed scale, were carried out without considering the effects of topographic positions (such as shoulder, backslope, and deposition slope).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%