2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Changing the Toothbrush on the Marginal Gingiva Microcirculation in the Adolescent Population—A Laser Doppler Flowmetry Assessment

Abstract: It is well-known that proper tooth brushing has the effect of stimulating microcirculation in a healthy gingiva. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microcirculation dynamics at the level of healthy marginal gingiva in adolescents after changing their toothbrush. Three evaluation instruments were employed to assess and quantify the effects on the marginal gingiva: the periodontal probing depth (PD), gingival index (GI) and laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). A total of 12 adolescents, aged between 15 and 20, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liquid rubber dam (SDI Gingival Barrier, SDI Ltd., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the supplementary isolation of the gingival tissue. The laser Doppler signal acquisition was performed according to our previous studies [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The physical parameters assessed were flux, expressed in perfusion units (PU), and DC, which indicates the position of the optical probe, reflecting its mechanic stability at the level of the reading area ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid rubber dam (SDI Gingival Barrier, SDI Ltd., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the supplementary isolation of the gingival tissue. The laser Doppler signal acquisition was performed according to our previous studies [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The physical parameters assessed were flux, expressed in perfusion units (PU), and DC, which indicates the position of the optical probe, reflecting its mechanic stability at the level of the reading area ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%