2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13524-016-0537-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Childhood Family Size on Fertility in Adulthood: New Evidence From IV Estimation

Abstract: Although fertility is positively correlated across generations, the causal effect of children's experience with larger sibships on their own fertility in adulthood is poorly understood. With the sex composition of the two firstborn children as an instrumental variable, we estimate the effect of sibship size on adult fertility using high-quality data from Norwegian administrative registers. Our study sample is all firstborns or second-borns during the 1960s in Norwegian families with at least two children (appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is different from another common IV used to estimate exogenous changes sibling size -sex composition of previous siblings. Analyses using this approach show positive effects of an additional sibling for sons, and negative effects for daughters (Cools and Hart 2014). These results might differ from the results of the approach used here, due to differences between planned and unplanned children (such as parental satisfaction with their family size).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is different from another common IV used to estimate exogenous changes sibling size -sex composition of previous siblings. Analyses using this approach show positive effects of an additional sibling for sons, and negative effects for daughters (Cools and Hart 2014). These results might differ from the results of the approach used here, due to differences between planned and unplanned children (such as parental satisfaction with their family size).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Different parity progression ratios based on sex composition of children are found in developed countries (e.g., Andersson et al 2006;Kolk and Schnettler 2013). This approach is used in ongoing work examining intergenerational transmission of fertility (Cools and Hart 2014). This approach, unlike a twin IV, estimates the effect of an additional planned (and wanted) birth instead of an unplanned additional sibling, which may differ in how it affects the experience of an additional sibling (e.g., the general satisfaction of the parents may differ).…”
Section: Research Design Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies show that the gender of current children influences parity progression, that is, the probability of having additional children (see Angrist and Evans, 1998;Black et al, 2005;Conley and Glauber, 2006;Åslund and Grönqvist, 2007;Dahl and Moretti, 2008;Cools and Kaldager Hart, 2015). In developed countries, the most common finding is that parents of two boys or two girls are more likely to have additional children than parents of a boy and a girl.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this spirit it is worthwhile to discuss a recent paper by Cools and Kaldager Hart (2015) on fertility outcomes. Using a sample of Norwegian singletons, they examine how sibling sex composition affects fertility.…”
Section: Family Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient on the inverse Mill's ratio is positive, but conditioning on a large set of 25 The estimates in this section must be nonetheless interpreted with caution because some residual endogeneity may remain if the spouse's only-child status is affected by unobservable variables that also determine her partner's LFP. To the best of our knowledge, the existing literature focuses mainly on motherson or mother-daughter intergenerational fertility correlations (e.g., Kolk 2014; Cools and Kaldager Hart 2016), while much less is known about the relation between a woman's fertility choices and her partner's family size. controls is not statistically significant at conventional levels.…”
Section: Appendix 2 Robustness Checks and Further Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%