2004
DOI: 10.1177/10983007040060040401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Choice-Making as an Intervention for Problem Behavior

Abstract: Supporting people with disabilities in expressing preferences and making choices is a core value in positive behavior support. Indeed, in recent years, the field has increasingly focused its attention on the importance of making choices and the potential benefits of choice-making opportunities in enhancing the quality of life of people with disabilities. In addition, an emerging database is suggesting that providing opportunities to make choices can serve as an intervention for decreasing problem behavior. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
144
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we can conclude that the behavioral treatments were equally effective regardless of the type of problem behavior that was targeted. This finding is consistent with several other meta-analyses published in this domain as well (e.g., Didden et al, 2006;Heyvaert et al, 2010Shogren, Faggella-Luby, Bae, & Wehmeyer, 2004), although some metaanalyses do report on statistically significant moderating effects of behavior type (e.g., Heyvaert et al, 2012;Vanderkerken et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Accordingly, we can conclude that the behavioral treatments were equally effective regardless of the type of problem behavior that was targeted. This finding is consistent with several other meta-analyses published in this domain as well (e.g., Didden et al, 2006;Heyvaert et al, 2010Shogren, Faggella-Luby, Bae, & Wehmeyer, 2004), although some metaanalyses do report on statistically significant moderating effects of behavior type (e.g., Heyvaert et al, 2012;Vanderkerken et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The final CRM strategy discussed by Wehby and Lane (in press) involves providing students with choice in activities. Shogren, Faggella-Luby, Bae, and Wehmeyer (2004) conducted a meta-analysis of choice-making interventions and found they were effective in reducing undesirable behaviors (see Wehby & Lane, in press, for a complete discussion of these procedures).…”
Section: Enhancing Classroom Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactive strategies are commonly used for behavior that is maintained by escape, delay, or avoidance (Geiger et al 2010), but are also used to embed reinforcement in the social or physical environment (making problem behavior unnecessary) and prompt appropriate responding related to other functions (increasing the likelihood of desirable behavior). Examples of strategies that have been demonstrated to be effective include curricular revisions (Dunlap and Kern 1996), providing opportunities for choice making (Dunlap et al 1994;Shogren et al 2004), visual schedules and other supports (Koyama and Wang 2011), behavioral rehearsal, e.g., social stories (Kokina and Kern 2010), and noncontingent reinforcement (Holden 2005).…”
Section: Assessment Of Contexts and Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%