2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of chronic fluoxetine on social isolation-induced changes on sucrose consumption, immobility behavior, and on serotonin and dopamine function in hippocampus and ventral striatum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in figure 2 show a significant decrease in swimming, followed by an increase in immobility time in stressed animals (p < 0.05), while climbing remained unaffected. This result is in accordance with data obtained from other laboratories where a statistically significant increase of immobility time in stressed animals was also detected [25,26]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results presented in figure 2 show a significant decrease in swimming, followed by an increase in immobility time in stressed animals (p < 0.05), while climbing remained unaffected. This result is in accordance with data obtained from other laboratories where a statistically significant increase of immobility time in stressed animals was also detected [25,26]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The antidepressant efficacy of MAP4343 was investigated in the isolation-rearing model that has been shown to induce "depressive-like" behaviors including recognition memory deficits (5), increased anxiety (16), and increased passive coping behavior (17). In the isolation-rearing model of depression, MAP4343 demonstrated clear antidepressant activity and important advantages compared with FLX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that rodent models are developed for homogeneity across subjects reducing confounding variables, such as genetic modifications and experiential factors (injury variables, individual epigenetic variability, and social housing conditions), that are known to affect depression-like behavior in rodents, there are clear differences in the expression of depression-like behaviors. [78][79][80] The evidence of depression in some subjects, but not others, is intriguing, but is commensurate with the human clinical condition. Indeed, in both human and animal populations, it is clear that not all individuals display all of the symptoms, or even the same constellation of symptoms, of depression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%