2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2364813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Classroom Performance Assessment on EFL Students' Basic and Inferential Reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other studies focused on one technique of AA. For instance, self-assessment (e.g., Alibakhshi & Shahrakipour, 2014;Ghaslani, 2015;Honsa, 2013;Meihami & Varmaghani, 2013;Moheidat & Baniabdelrahman, 2011;Moqbel, 2018;Purwanti, 2015); peer assessment (e.g., Azarnoosh, 2013;Peng, 2009); portfolio assessment (e.g., Charvade, Jahandar, & Khodabandehlou, 2012;Shokraie & Tabrizi, 2016;Tavakoli & Amirian, 2012); performancebased assessment (e.g., El-Koumy, 2009;Yildirim & Orsdemir, 2013); conferencing assessment (e.g., Baleghizadeh & Zarghami, 2012). Some others focused on two techniques of AA, such as selfassessment and peer assessment (e.g., Birjandi & Tamjid, 2012) or portfolios and conferencing (e.g., Moradan & Hedayati, 2011).…”
Section: Methods Of Alternative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other studies focused on one technique of AA. For instance, self-assessment (e.g., Alibakhshi & Shahrakipour, 2014;Ghaslani, 2015;Honsa, 2013;Meihami & Varmaghani, 2013;Moheidat & Baniabdelrahman, 2011;Moqbel, 2018;Purwanti, 2015); peer assessment (e.g., Azarnoosh, 2013;Peng, 2009); portfolio assessment (e.g., Charvade, Jahandar, & Khodabandehlou, 2012;Shokraie & Tabrizi, 2016;Tavakoli & Amirian, 2012); performancebased assessment (e.g., El-Koumy, 2009;Yildirim & Orsdemir, 2013); conferencing assessment (e.g., Baleghizadeh & Zarghami, 2012). Some others focused on two techniques of AA, such as selfassessment and peer assessment (e.g., Birjandi & Tamjid, 2012) or portfolios and conferencing (e.g., Moradan & Hedayati, 2011).…”
Section: Methods Of Alternative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as part of the preparation for pre-teaching, the teacher engages students to comprehend the audio or text provided, following which the teacher offers training for them to practice their understanding of the material. Richards, (1985), (Salam & Khalek El-Koumy, 2009), (Magfirah et al, 2023) asserts that the fundamental components of a lesson plan include a warm-up or review, introduction to a new lesson, presentation of new information, practice and application of the new language or information, and evaluation to assess the students' grasp of the lesson. This structured approach ensures that students are actively involved in the learning process and have opportunities to both learn and apply new skills or knowledge.…”
Section: To What Extent Do the Teachers Implement Listening Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant literature includes a lot of studies that highlighted the positive attitudes of teachers (e.g., Alkharusi, Aldhafri, Alnabhani, & Alkalbani, 2012;Chan, 2008;Ghaicha & Omarkaly, 2018;Gonzales & Aliponga, 2012) or students (e.g., Azarnoosh, 2013;Cornelius & Kinghorn, 2014;Elezovic, 2011;Moqbel, 2018) towards AA. Nonetheless, AA has its own opponents who expressed their reservation about the validity, reliability, and objectivity of AA methods (El-Koumy, 2009;Huerta-Macías, 2002). The proponents of AA, in contrast, stated that AA is valid in terms of consequences, authenticity, cognitive complexity, significance, and efficiency and that reliability can be achieved through using a variety of assessment methods to collect data about student learning; appropriate rubrics for scoring; and more than a single observer, interviewer or reader (El-Koumy, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, AA has its own opponents who expressed their reservation about the validity, reliability, and objectivity of AA methods (El-Koumy, 2009;Huerta-Macías, 2002). The proponents of AA, in contrast, stated that AA is valid in terms of consequences, authenticity, cognitive complexity, significance, and efficiency and that reliability can be achieved through using a variety of assessment methods to collect data about student learning; appropriate rubrics for scoring; and more than a single observer, interviewer or reader (El-Koumy, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%