2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cognitive load on nonverbal behavior in the cognitive interview for suspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, this escalates the psychological burdens. 24,25 In our study, we also found that women were more prone to zoom fatigue. A high presence of zoom fatigue in women is also shown in some studies; for example, investigations in Sweden and the USA reported a 13.8% higher zoom fatigue proportion in women than in men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Nonetheless, this escalates the psychological burdens. 24,25 In our study, we also found that women were more prone to zoom fatigue. A high presence of zoom fatigue in women is also shown in some studies; for example, investigations in Sweden and the USA reported a 13.8% higher zoom fatigue proportion in women than in men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Nugroho et al () defined a fuzzy rule corresponding with greater blink frequency when lying. Furthermore, greater blink frequency was associated with lying in interviews (Frosina et al, ) and yes/no questions (George, Pai, Pai, & Praharaj, ). These studies do not differentiate between the PL and the SL, which require different cognitive loads, and therefore might have produced different effects on blink frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from this study showed that the interviewers were able to discriminate truth from lies in the CIS context and that their accuracy increased as they progressed through the various stages of the protocol. Two other studies have assessed the ability to discriminate between truth and lies in the CIS protocol (Frosina et al., 2018; Logue et al., 2015). In these studies, the participants in the truthful condition had to play a game with a confederate, whereas those in the deceptive condition had to steal $10 from a confederate's wallet, while pretending that they had also played the game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were then interviewed by CIS‐trained college students. Deception was rated by means of two methods: verbal cues (Logue et al., 2015) and physiological cues (Frosina et al., 2018). The results showed that these lie detection methods were effective and applicable in the CIS context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%