2018
DOI: 10.1108/aaaj-10-2016-2731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cognitive reflection on the efficacy of impression management

Abstract: Equipe técnica Edição sob responsabilidade do Conselho Federal de Contabilidade.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this study focuses on the transmission (preparer perspective) of narrative information with impression management purposes. The efficacy of these techniques may be influenced by different cognitive characteristics of users (Cardoso et al , 2018). Moreover, specifically, analysts may perceive graphs differently from texts (Cardoso et al , 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study focuses on the transmission (preparer perspective) of narrative information with impression management purposes. The efficacy of these techniques may be influenced by different cognitive characteristics of users (Cardoso et al , 2018). Moreover, specifically, analysts may perceive graphs differently from texts (Cardoso et al , 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As my review exhibits, these graphs constitute the prevalent form of information visualization. Common quantitative visualizations are line and bar charts, often showcasing a development over time and regularly used in financial reporting (Cardoso et al 2018) and controlling (Hutchinson et al 2010). In scientific literature, probabilistic charts such as scatterplots, boxplots, and probability distribution charts (Allen et al 2014) frequently depict risk and uncertainty.…”
Section: Definition Of Key Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O ceticismo é uma postura exigida do auditor durante seu exercício profissional pelas normas de auditoria brasileiras e internacionais (NOLDER; KADOUS, 2018;MARÇAL;ALBERTON, 2020). A ausência de ceticismo é considerada uma das principais razões que causam falhas e não percepção de erros na auditoria (CARMICHAEL;CRAIG, 1996). Boa parte das fraudes derivam da incapacidade da auditoria para identificar a manipulação de informações por parte dos gestores (NELSON, 2009), o nível de ceticismo também afeta o julgamento e a tomada de decisão na auditoria (POPOVA, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Sendo assim, nota-se a importância do ceticismo, não apenas na atuação do auditor, mas para os usuários da informação contábil de forma geral, pois elevado nível de ceticismo frente a diversas situações contribui para um melhor julgamento e detecção de erros/fraudes das demonstrações contábeis (CARMICHAEL;CRAIG, 1996;CUNHA et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified